Author Topic: Interesting comment:  (Read 1537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2021, 09:41:PM »
Witness Intimidation, Bribery and Corruption-----is what the case was made up of. No concrete evidence.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2021, 11:34:PM »
I agree with much of what the commenter says, but not all.

For instance, I disagree with the assertion that the evidence shows with certainty that Sheila could not be the killer. 

Unfortunately, this case falls into the 'black box' category, and there is reasonable doubt.  I don't like it as it  means that a probable mass murderer - a double child killer to boot - can continue pleading innocence, but I don't get to say what the evidence is. 

It is what it is.  I'm just being honest and objective about it.  I would have to vote Not Guilty, if I were on a trial jury hearing this.  Sorry.

But in all your posts you cannot come up anything that could prove he was the killer???? Are you shocked that there are still many statements from Julie still withheld

The  key to proving the truth will be those documents
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest29835

  • Guest
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2021, 11:38:PM »
What are you talking about?

Prat.

Thanks Adam.  I agree that as part of your moral support efforts, it's important to give people the 'hard word' from time-to-time.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2021, 03:06:AM »
But in all your posts you cannot come up anything that could prove he was the killer???? Are you shocked that there are still many statements from Julie still withheld

The  key to proving the truth will be those documents

Check reply 6. Sources in capitals.

Not forgetting Julie's 34 page WS. Her draft WS's are long gone in line with protocol.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2021, 03:06:AM »
Thanks Adam.  I agree that as part of your moral support efforts, it's important to give people the 'hard word' from time-to-time.

What are you thanking me for?

Prat.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2021, 07:50:AM »
But in all your posts you cannot come up anything that could prove he was the killer???? Are you shocked that there are still many statements from Julie still withheld

The  key to proving the truth will be those documents


?????????
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest29835

  • Guest
Re: Interesting comment:
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2021, 11:42:AM »
What are you thanking me for?

Prat.

Appreciate it's frustrating for Adam because he knows the truth, that Jeremy is innocent, but he has to keep up a front as a guilter, so he is going to lash out from time-to-time.