'Unidentified Male' DNA' found on/in Silencer, could belong to 'PC Whiddon'...

[mike tesko]

Did 'PC Whiddon' contaminate one of the 'Silencers' with 'his' DNA?

[mike tesko]

'Di Cook' also dismantled one of the 'Silencers' ('DB/1') and 'separating its metal end cap', removing 'one flat metal washer', and '17 internalised metal baffle plates' during which time 'he' separated 'half a dozen of the metal baffle plates' (taken from the muzzle end of the 'Silencer') from the other 11, or so baffle plates. 'He took photographs of the dismantling and the examination, thereof, and at that time, he failed to note a presence of any blood on the metal baffle plates, otherwise he would have been credited with discovering the blood that was subsequently found there once 'Silencer', 'DB/1' had been delivered to Huntingdon Lab' on the '30th August 1985'...

[mike tesko]

'Blood' was found to be present in the first half dozen or so ('muzzle end') metal baffle plates, belonging to exhibit 'DB/1' on the following dates at the Lab' -

12th August 1985
13th August 1985
18th August 1985
19th August 1985..

'DS Davison' and 'DS Eastwood' fingerprinted the other 'Silencer' ('DRB/1') at police HQ, on the '13th August 1985'. Then, on the 20th August 1985, Essex police forwarded that 'Silencer' to Huntingdon Lab' on the ', 20th September 1985' along with an 'ammunition box' and a 'telescopic sight, to be' checked for the presence of blood'. The 'Silencer' ('DRB/1') that was submitted to the lab' that date, was not provision ally examined until the '25th September 1985'

[mike tesko]

The 'Silencer (' DRB/1') was the one which 'David Boutflour' telephoned Essex police about, on the '12th September 1985', when he told police that 'he' had found the 'Silencer' to the gun! On the previous day ('11th September 1985'), his sister, 'Ann Eaton' had 'handed over that' Silencer ' over to the police (' DC Oakley'/'Oakey', along with the' ammunition box', and the rifles, 'telescopic sight'..

On the '14th September 1985', 'DC Oakley' /'Oakey' went to the crime scene, and took the first photographs of scratch marks on the kitchen aga surround...

It therefore, appears as though, police still had the 'Silencer' ('DRB/1') in their possession, and that it was used to fabricate the red paint evidence, that got associated with/to the kitchen aga surround and 'Silencer ' ('DRB/1') on the 2nd October 1985 once the 'Silencer' in Question was submitted to the lab' to be examined for the very first time, on the '20th September 1985'...

[mike tesko]

The 'Blood group' evidence, which was presented as belonging exclusively to 'Sheila Caffell' was associated with / to the 'Silencer' ('DB/1') which had been submitted to Huntingdon lab' on the '30th August 1985'.The red paint evidence relating to scratch marks that were photographed at the scene, for the very first time on the '14th September 1985', were associated or linked exclusively to the other ('different') 'Silencer' ('DRB/1'), which/that 'DS Davison', and 'DS Sastwood' fingerprinted at police HQ, on the 13th August 1985, and. Which was subsequently sent to the lab'  to be examined for the very first time, on the '20th September 1985'...

'Relatives', 'police', and 'lab' experts' were involved from thereon in,  in an elaborate plot, to make out a false case, that 'blood' and 'red paint' evidence, belonged to, and 'originated from only one of these 'Silencers', when in actual fact, two different 'Silencers' were involved, each forwarded to Huntingdon lab' on two separate /different occasions!

Exhibit references, pertaining to the 'Silencer' were duly altered to give an impression that there had been some sort of a clerical mix up, regarding the actual exhibit reference, of a 'Silencer' that was falsified at the lab' on all those/these separate occasions...

In 'a nutshell' the same 'silencer' could not havet been in the same two places, being examined and checked by different people at one and the same time! 'David Boutflour' cannot have found the same 'Silencer' twice in the 'same gun cupboard' , on 'two separate occasions' ('10th August 1985', and or the '11th September 1985')! Two people ('Peter Eaton' and 'Ann Eaton') cannot have handed the same 'Silencer' over to two different police officers ('DS Jones' and or 'DC Oakley' /'Oakey'), once on the evening of the '12th August 1985', and again on the '11th September 1985', if, there was only ever one 'Silencer', 'found' , and 'handed over' to the police by the relatives, who in turn claim that they had 'it' in their possession continuously from the evening of the '12th August 1985', onwards!

[mike tesko]

Both of these/those two 'Silencers' ('DB/1' and 'DRB/1') did not ha e the exact same number of internal metal baffle plates. One had 17, due to the date of its manufacture in '1980', whilst the other had 'fewer' due to the date of its manufacture ('November, 1984'). Based on this information, the 'Silencer' exhibited at trial, 'DRB/1', inside which the red paint evidence was falsified, had 17 metal baffle plates (because it was manufactured in 1980). This is compelling evidence which shows that the red paint evidence linked to the scratch marks on the kitchen aga surround, could not have been made by the 'Silencer', belonging to the 'Bamber', 'Silencer'..

'It' is well documented in the case file, that 'A thiny Pargeter' purchased a Parker hale 'Silencer' in 1980. Therefore, 'his' 17 baffled `Silencer '