'Fresh Evidence' - Unearthed in 'Mike Tesko's' review of case file, documents!!!

[mike tesko]

Thank you, everyone, for giving your honest opinions regarding this matter!

As things stand now, I know that the wrong summing up given to the jury regarding what the prosecution's blood expert said whilst testifying on oath, that he was satisfied that the blood discovered in (a) the sound moderator was 'exclusive' to having belonged to 'SheilaCaffell', with only a remote possibility that the blood type results arrived at, when the analysis was completed, could/might be 'an intimate mixture of the parents bloods!

This/that testimony, and the choices by which the trial judge told the jury that they should/could decide who was responsible for all of these murders, could only relate to either, 'Sheila', or 'Jeremy', with no 'third party involvement', whatsoever...

Well, the prosecution's blood expert ('John Hayward') misled the jury who were primarily in charge of either finding in favour of the defendant ('Jeremy Bamber'), or not. With this/that in mind, 'John Hayward' should have included the fact that 'the blood found in (a) the sound moderator, could have on one hand, originated exclusively from 'Robert Woodwis Boutflour', or indeed, even exclusively from 'Sheila Caffell', as well as the possibility that 'the blood could have been an intimate mixture of both parents blood(s)'...

In other words, it was 'impossible to say w, a year prior to the start of the trial?

ith a degree of certainty, who the blood test results belonged to, or originated from!

The other major discrepancy which springs to mind, is that the relatives (including 'Robert Woodwis Boutflour', did not give, or be requested to provide voluntary blood samples, until the 1991 'COLP Investigation'! So with this in mind, what are we not being told, why Essex police had confirmation that 'Robert Woodwis Boutflour' had the same blood groups as 'Sheila Caffell'?.

Based on what we know, because we have documentary proof that the 'city of London police', did not request for blood to be taken until on or after 1991, or thereabouts! So the key question is now, why did Essex police request, or obtain a blood sample from the subject ('Robert Woodwis Boutflour', back in October 1985)?

[mike tesko]

The defence don't strictly need a document that explicitly states that the blood could have belonged to Robert Boutflour.  That was already known at trial, as the family all gave blood samples prior to the trial for this very reason, it was known that Robert and Sheila had the same blood group, and the blood was never matched to Sheila - it was only a grouping.  Furthermore, the DNA captured later (1990s) was not blood-based. 

A distant relative went on record saying that he/she/they thought the Boutflour'/Eaton family members were trying to frame 'Jeremy Bamber' for the murders!

'Robert Woodwis Boutflour' had his blood tested (pre-trial), which coincidences with it being established that both 'Sheila', and 'himself' had 'the same blood group results' !  This was at a time when 'DNA' had not yet come into play in the form of scientific evidence capable of turning the verdict of a jury, one way or another! He also had 'his blood' taken (again) when 'COLP' investigated in the 1990's! On this/that occasion, the blood sample taken from 'Pamela Boutflour', 'Robert Woodwis Boutflour', 'David Boutflour', 'Ann Eaton',  and 'Peter Eaton' were taken with the view of 'testing/analysing blood group activity' , and 'DNA' comparison, of the key 'relatives' possible, 'deliberate contamination' of (a) the 'sound moderator' !

The 'DNA' profiling 'test/ results' obtained during the 1990's investigation, cast doubt on any suggestion that 'the blood' (attributed to the original/ earlier findings, was not unique  to 'Sheila Caffell', or to anyone else who was being 'DNA' profiled') ! However, it was 'accepted' , that some 'DNA' belonging to 'an unidentified Male person' was found to be present upon some of 'the internalised baffle plates' !

Well, we now know that 'David Boutflour', 'Robert Woodwis Boutflour', 'Peter Eaton', plus Ann Eaton, 'all handled the silencer' , at 'one time' or 'another'(1st time/or/and 2nd time, around). 'How come' , there are 'no Lab' documents/ reports/documentation' concerning 'the 1st lot of blood sample blood group testing/analysis/proven results' only 'the 2nd lot' of blood sample 'DNA' testings after 'the beginning' of 'COLPS' 1990 enquiry?