The Official Jeremy Bamber and White House Farm Podcast Series - Season 1

[lookout]

Why summon help or wake June at 3am when Jeremy is only 3 miles away and Chelmsford police only 21 miles away?

Why not ? They were farm workers and would have been nearly ready to rise for work during the harvest.
A few shots fired into the air would have brought help from them.

[lookout]

Roch, todays podcast is interesting and read by DeeDee Sadler. All about what happened inside the farmhouse that night.

[Steve_uk]

Roch, todays podcast is interesting and read by DeeDee Sadler. All about what happened inside the farmhouse that night.

Yes: mendacious propaganda at its most accomplished..https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/-home

[lookout]

Yes: mendacious propaganda at its most accomplished..https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/-home

A lot of what was spoken about was from police logs/ information as it can't be afforded at this juncture to be using propaganda in submissions to the CCRC since they've "seen it all before" in the past. It wouldn't be allowed anyway.

[Steve_uk]

A lot of what was spoken about was from police logs/ information as it can't be afforded at this juncture to be using propaganda in submissions to the CCRC since they've "seen it all before" in the past. It wouldn't be allowed anyway.

I'll be looking forward to the substantial new information (or however they have worded it) concerning the telephone calls. This can't be fudged, spun or falsified as this latest podcast has (admittedly) with a modicum of success striven to do.

[Adam]

Ok Steve, I found this from Adam in an earlier post,  Barbara Wilson said the family knew about the caravan break in. Neville probably suspected and Jeremy admitted it, confident it would be kept private. This would have further strained relations within the family.

I thought I’d read somewhere that his Father paid the money back and Jeremy was supposed to repay his father?

Have you got a source that his family knew?

Mind you it wouldn't take much working out. A petty thief wouldn't bother breaking in. Only someone who knew there was money inside would.

[Steve_uk]

Have you got a source that his family knew?

Mind you it wouldn't take much working out. A petty thief wouldn't bother breaking in. Only someone who knew there was money inside would.

There was no definite proof at the time but it had to be someone who knew James Carr was off sick that particular weekend, knew where to retrieve the key and knew the risks were worthwhile as Jeremy had persuaded his father not to bank the money.

Of course as events turned out Jeremy admitted to the lesser crime, sticking to his adage that "it's important to tell the truth wherever possible.."

[lookout]

And in doing so, it's got him 35 years so far ( telling the truth, that is )

[Roch]

Roch, todays podcast is interesting and read by DeeDee Sadler. All about what happened inside the farmhouse that night.

Probably the best one I have heard so far, though I suspect it may only be 70% accurate.  Nevertheless, that in itself is 100% more accurate than the conviction.  Personally, I feel vindicated regarding most of wounds mentioned.  The claim of hand prints on June's person is interesting.

Sadly though, it will likely be any inaccuracies that count the most, rather than any new accuracies. 

[David1819]

Probably the best one I have heard so far, though I suspect it may only be 70% accurate.  Nevertheless, that in itself is 100% more accurate than the conviction.  Personally, I feel vindicated regarding most of wounds mentioned.  The claim of hand prints on June's person is interesting.

Sadly though, it will likely be any inaccuracies that count the most, rather than any new accuracies.

What wounds are you talking about?

[Roch]

What wounds are you talking about?

You wil have to listen to the podcast. Just grimace at the bits you don't agree with.  This is why I asked for your walkthrough - for comparison.

[David1819]

You wil have to listen to the podcast. Just grimace at the bits you don't agree with.  This is why I asked for your walkthrough - for comparison.

Bills claim of 37 wounds on Sheila is laughable. All that is on Sheila's arm is blood drops and runs of blood. There are two tiny cuts on Sheila's hand and thats it.

[Bill Robertson]

Bills claim of 37 wounds on Sheila is laughable. All that is on Sheila's arm is blood drops and runs of blood. There are two tiny cuts on Sheila's hand and thats it.

It’s 28 wounds, not 37. Clearly visible on high definition crime scene photographs and verified by independent forensic experts. All will be revealed at the Court of Appeal. Then, Vanezis will have to face the consequences of his false testimony.
As Confucius says, he who laughs last laughs loudest. You won’t be laughing then.

[Roch]

Bills claim of 37 wounds on Sheila is laughable. All that is on Sheila's arm is blood drops and runs of blood. There are two tiny cuts on Sheila's hand and thats it.

I disagree with you that wounds aren't present David. There are some things we just have to agree to disagree. I am less confident on some of the other claims made in the podcasts overall. It may be that in those matters, I would find my position closer to yours or other supporters.

[David1819]

It’s 28 wounds, not 37. Clearly visible on high definition crime scene photographs and verified by independent forensic experts. All will be revealed at the Court of Appeal. Then, Vanezis will have to face the consequences of his false testimony.
As Confucius says, he who laughs last laughs loudest. You won’t be laughing then.

I have the same photos in my possession, I can see what they are.

Who ever has told you this has been verified is either pulling your leg or they have hired a dishonest clown.

How do you explain these 28 "wounds" not being mentioned in Vanezis autopsy notes written on the very same day as the tragedy?. DI Cook and two other officers were also present at the autopsy how did they not see all these wounds also?