Lest We Forget...................

[guest29835]

    He didn't know how much was in the wallet. He also didn't know that Anne Eaton had taken it and that she withheld this information from him when he complained to the police about the wallet being missing. Jeremy said there was 4/500 hundred pounds in the wallet as I remember.
   Anne Eaton definitely knew how much it contained because it was she who had removed her deceased uncle's wallet.
   The letters won't be posted because there are a standing joke and easily dissected

Thanks - but I want to make up my own mind.  To be fair, somebody says he did know how much was in the wallet, and that could be considered interesting, and maybe suspicious.  I'm also interested to know how he can tell Caroline he can't remember and then suddenly remember later on, though of course that could be the entirely innocent vicissitudes of memory. 

Anyway, unless I see the letters, all I'm left with (if I understand this right) is Ann Eaton's claims.  Didn't Ann Eaton keep the wallet and not tell Jeremy, or have I got that wrong?

[guest29835]

Obviously Caroline did not change stance from hardcore supporter to hardcore guilter because Bamber either mistakedly or deliberately did not answer one question on the wallet.

It would have been a build up of different things over several months.

The forum was 90% supporters when I joined. Now it is more 50%. Some of the points made by guilters would have influenced her.

I didn't know that.  Thanks Adam.

[Adam]

I didn't know that.  Thanks Adam.

Believe Caroline is saying that was her reason.

Keep up.

[gringo]

Thanks - but I want to make up my own mind.  To be fair, somebody says he did know how much was in the wallet, and that could be considered interesting, and maybe suspicious.  I'm also interested to know how he can tell Caroline he can't remember and then suddenly remember later on, though of course that could be the entirely innocent vicissitudes of memory. 

Anyway, unless I see the letters, all I'm left with (if I understand this right) is Ann Eaton's claims.  Didn't Ann Eaton keep the wallet and not tell Jeremy, or have I got that wrong?

   Who is stopping you making up your own mind?
   Nothing that I posted is in dispute.

[gringo]

Thanks - but I want to make up my own mind.  To be fair, somebody says he did know how much was in the wallet, and that could be considered interesting, and maybe suspicious.  I'm also interested to know how he can tell Caroline he can't remember and then suddenly remember later on, though of course that could be the entirely innocent vicissitudes of memory. 

Anyway, unless I see the letters, all I'm left with (if I understand this right) is Ann Eaton's claims.  Didn't Ann Eaton keep the wallet and not tell Jeremy, or have I got that wrong?

    http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6439.195.html   
   It is discussed here. I am sure that the questions and answers will be instructive in helping you to make up your own mind.

[lookout]

I wonder if it was ever handed in for probate purposes ? What a damn silly thought !

[Adam]

It will be hard to change stance. It means someone changing their mind on a long term view. Publically admitting they were wrong.

David attempted a quiet stance change. So he could quote 5 year old posts of Caroline & Jane.  He eventually gave two reasons, one he refuses to discuss. As well as claiming he made a 'forensic evidence breakthrough' but refusing to say what it was.

Jane changed stance without a reason & Caroline has given one reason.

[Adam]

I went into the case with an open mind. As didn't know anything about it. Reading stuff online before reading an acclaimed book from Wilkes.

With a mountain of forensic and circumstantial evidence, he could only be guilty. I don't believe there was an industrial frame involving EP, relatives, experts, the courts & Julie.

[JackieD]

I wonder if it was ever handed in for probate purposes ? What a damn silly thought !

Come on Lookout really !!

[Caroline]

You see? This why! Out of the woodwork they creep. 

[Caroline]

Thanks - but I want to make up my own mind.  To be fair, somebody says he did know how much was in the wallet, and that could be considered interesting, and maybe suspicious.  I'm also interested to know how he can tell Caroline he can't remember and then suddenly remember later on, though of course that could be the entirely innocent vicissitudes of memory. 

Anyway, unless I see the letters, all I'm left with (if I understand this right) is Ann Eaton's claims.  Didn't Ann Eaton keep the wallet and not tell Jeremy, or have I got that wrong?

No, she gave the wallet to the executor.

[JackieD]

You see? This why! Out of the woodwork they creep. 

Try watching the money trail and it will explain in detail why everyone is suspicious about the whereabouts of the Bamber money and goods even Barbara Wilson

[Caroline]

Of course it could be suspicious if he knew what was in the wallet.  Yes, that's why I'm interested. 

But we only have your interpretation of things, and you refuse to let us judge for ourselves.

And actually, you're the one who brought it up.  You don't mention the wallet specifically in this thread, but I know it's one of the things you alluded to earlier.  You mention it now and then on the Forum and I see from previous discussions that when people ask you questions about it, you get huffy and refuse to answer.  You seem to want it both ways.

It's entirely your business what view you take about Jeremy, but you come on here and tell us this, that and the other, and it's reasonable to ask questions about it.  Nobody is accusing you of lying, it's just that over a long period of time, I've learned to be sceptical whenever somebody starts blackening Jeremy or casting aspersions on him.  More often than not, there's little substance in it, rather it's that the person simply dislikes Jeremy.

Perhaps if NG1066 and Roch have copies, they could post them up here?  I'm sure Caroline won't mind, though I don't understand why Caroline is making an issue about it.  Just post them up.  What's the big deal?

I will mind, I had enough of the troll element last time I posted them and they are here now as I knew they would be  .

Actually, I wasn't talking about the wallet specifically when I said I asked questions. That's a conclusion you jumped to.

I suggest you write to him yourself and ask the question.

[lookout]

No, she gave the wallet to the executor.

Full or empty ?

[Caroline]

Full or empty ?

No idea on that Lookout.