https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/case
Seems the aim is to 'potentionally undermine the safety of the conviction'. Rather than prove innocence.
The CT accept there is other evidence, but want to prove that there was a second moderator recovered from the farm. Not sure how that is so important.
If you're not sure why proof of the finding of a second moderator is important, despite commenting over 21,000 times on this forum alone, then you are out of your depth.
You have exposed both your lack of understanding and the bad faith in which you post into just two lines. You would not question why EP would lie about this. Given proof of a second moderator, you would assume that EP lied for over 30 years for no apparent reason. It wouldn't occur to you that if EP are proven to have lied to ask why.
Where exactly was this second moderator found? When?
The story told at trial about the moderator being put into the cupboard which meant that it couldn't be Sheila. What about this second moderator? Where was this second moderator? Would that be important? Why have EP covered it up? The whole paper and evidence trail obviously would need reevaluating in light of this. Questions, questions or, if you're Adam, a shrug of the shoulders and bewilderment.
Have a think about it and then you could write one of your lists, because we know you like lists, with reasons as to why a second moderator is important/unimportant
