Det. Supt. 'Mick' Ainsley - oversight of corrupt practices

[Bill Robertson]

As for lone voices its only you and Bill that believe the blood streams and stains on Sheila's arm are actually "28 wounds" 

Not quite; add Mark Newby, Joe Stone and the forensic experts who examined the photos. Plus, the Campaign Team. In fact, quite a lot of people have seen the primary evidence and agree with us. I appreciate that you have not seen the original evidence, but when you do I am sure that you will change your mind.

[Adam]

COA

'There was no evidence of any other mark or injury to Sheila Caffell's body such as might be suffered during a fight or in a scuffle.'

----------

Twenty eight wounds is a lot and would take a long time to inflict. Obviously Nevill, June or both would have restrained her instead of inflicting wounds.

[Roch]

COA

'There was no evidence of any other mark or injury to Sheila Caffell's body such as might be suffered during a fight or in a scuffle.'

----------

Twenty eight wounds is a lot and would take a long time to inflict. Obviously Nevill, June or both would have restrained her instead of inflicting wounds.

A wound can be a single nick, cut, graze. They can be small. I would argue that in a desperate life or death struggle, it would be easy for any of the adults to sustain wounds in an extremely quick manner, without even realising. Adrenaline and whatever else would be at high levels.

[Roch]

Not quite; add Mark Newby, Joe Stone and the forensic experts who examined the photos. Plus, the Campaign Team. In fact, quite a lot of people have seen the primary evidence and agree with us. I appreciate that you have not seen the original evidence, but when you do I am sure that you will change your mind.

Exactly.

[Adam]

A wound can be a single nick, cut, graze. They can be small. I would argue that in a desperate life or death struggle, it would be easy for any of the adults to sustain wounds in an extremely quick manner, without even realising. Adrenaline and whatever else would be at high levels.

How would June or Nevill inflict 28 nicks onto Sheila? They were both bare footed in pyjamas/nightdress.

[Adam]

Nevill was the only person who had extra injuries. These were horrific and inflicted by Bamber during the kitchen fight.

[Roch]

How would June or Nevill inflict 28 nicks onto Sheila? They were both bare footed in pyjamas/nightdress.

The wounds could have been caused by force being applied in an attempt to disarm Sheila or thwart her plans.  I have a theory that the adults' intervention directly interfered with Sheila's plan to follow her children to the other side. She would then need to incapacitate or kill both adults, in order to join the twins. 

[Adam]

The wounds could have been caused by force being applied in an attempt to disarm Sheila or thwart her plans.  I have a theory that the adults' intervention directly interfered with Sheila's plan to follow her children to the other side. She would then need to incapacitate or kill both adults, in order to join the twins.

How could June, Nevill or both inflict 28 wounds with their bare hands?

Nevill or Nevill with June would have disarmed Sheila. June on her own would have found it more difficult but Nevill would have quickly helped her.

As previously said a fully fit Nevill would have instantly disarmed Sheila. He had an early start in the morning.

[Roch]

How could June, Nevill or both inflict 28 wounds with their bare hands?

Nevill or Nevill with June would have disarmed Sheila. June on her own would have found it more difficult but Nevill would have quickly helped her.

As previously said a fully fit Nevill would have instantly disarmed Sheila. He had an early start in the morning.

By pulling her chain from behind. By grappling with her, whereby stationary objects would be hit. By using fingernails with pressure.

[David1819]

Not quite; add Mark Newby, Joe Stone and the forensic experts who examined the photos. Plus, the Campaign Team. In fact, quite a lot of people have seen the primary evidence and agree with us. I appreciate that you have not seen the original evidence, but when you do I am sure that you will change your mind.

Like I have already explained. Someone in the campaign team is either pulling your leg or they have hired a dishonest clown who will say anything for money and will get slaughtered by a counter expert brought in by the CCRC.

[Roch]

Like I have already explained. Someone in the campaign team is either pulling your leg or they have hired a dishonest clown who will say anything for money and will get slaughtered by a counter expert brought in by the CCRC.

A more likely explanation is that, with a higher definition of clarity, it is more easy to spot the wounds. 

Even QC was able to venture as a lay person, that the image on here of Sheila's right hand appears to display wounds.  He hasn't even seen a higher-def image of her right hand.  All the people on here who refused to accept the image showed wounds, were guilters.  Bit of a coincidence?

[David1819]

Bubo bubo. The report below might be of interest to you. Explaining the situation regarding June being shot in bed.

[Bubo bubo]

This man has been totally discredited as a human being. (Now deceased)  if not as a forensic scientist. The report is preliminary and was produced for a publishing company. He strikes me as a disreputable man and a paedophile/abuser.

He could easily be blackmailed by threatening to expose his misdeeds. He could produce a report that specified what the findings required should be.

For these reasons I suggest that he is an unreliable witness and his report may not be worth the paper it is printed on.

[Bubo bubo]

This man has been totally discredited as a human being. (Now deceased)  if not as a forensic scientist. The report is preliminary and was produced for a publishing company. He strikes me as a disreputable man and a paedophile/abuser.

He could easily be blackmailed by threatening to expose his misdeeds. He could produce a report that specified what the findings required should be.

For these reasons I suggest that he is an unreliable witness and his report may not be worth the paper it is printed on.

try this site
https://forensicfraud.blogspot.com/2013/07/herb-macdonnell-founder-of-bloodstain.html

[Bill Robertson]

Like I have already explained. Someone in the campaign team is either pulling your leg or they have hired a dishonest clown who will say anything for money and will get slaughtered by a counter expert brought in by the CCRC.

In probably the most high profile miscarriage of justice case in the UK a professional barrister does not go before the COA to argue a case based upon the work of so-called “clowns “. You are advised to temper your scorn as it will in due course become an embarrassment to you.