PEN PAL FROM HELL Jeremy Bamber sent me hundreds of twisted letters from prison

[JackieD]

Tut tut! Is that a threat, Jackie? I believe the issuing of threats is something which is not looked kindly on. However, you're quite wrong. I HAVEN'T been warned, unlike yourself who undoubtedly WILL have been. Bans are rarely imposed without the miscreant having been given prior notice.

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying ...

[JackieD]

Tut tut! Is that a threat, Jackie? I believe the issuing of threats is something which is not looked kindly on. However, you're quite wrong. I HAVEN'T been warned, unlike yourself who undoubtedly WILL have been. Bans are rarely imposed without the miscreant having been given prior notice.

Trolls will make deliberately cruel, racist, homophobic and sexist comments - or even tell people to kill themselves - then sit back to enjoy the outraged responses.

[JackieD]

Tut tut! Is that a threat, Jackie? I believe the issuing of threats is something which is not looked kindly on. However, you're quite wrong. I HAVEN'T been warned, unlike yourself who undoubtedly WILL have been. Bans are rarely imposed without the miscreant having been given prior notice.

In October 2016, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) introduced new laws that could see those who create “derogatory hashtags” or post “humiliating” Photoshopped images JAILED.

Inciting people to harass others online, known as virtual mobbing, is among the offences included in the guidance.

Baiting – when someone is humiliated online by being branded sexually promiscuous – is also mentioned in the guidance.

The CPS also announced the launch of a hate crime consultation, issuing a series of public policy statements centred on combating crimes against disabled people, as well as racial, religious, homophobic and transphobic hate crime.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said: “Social media can be used to educate, entertain and enlighten, but there are also people who use it to bully, intimidate and harass.

“Ignorance is not a defence and perceived anonymity is not an escape. Those who commit these acts, or encourage others to do the same, can and will be prosecuted.”

[Jane]

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying ...

Clearly you know such a person well. You're describing who it is you see in your mirror.

[Jane]

Trolls will make deliberately cruel, racist, homophobic and sexist comments - or even tell people to kill themselves - then sit back to enjoy the outraged responses.

Oh dear me! How you love talking about yourself. Your last post was all about you, too.

[sami]

Oh dear me! How you love talking about yourself. Your last post was all about you, too.

[Jane]

In October 2016, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) introduced new laws that could see those who create “derogatory hashtags” or post “humiliating” Photoshopped images JAILED.

Inciting people to harass others online, known as virtual mobbing, is among the offences included in the guidance.

Baiting – when someone is humiliated online by being branded sexually promiscuous – is also mentioned in the guidance.

The CPS also announced the launch of a hate crime consultation, issuing a series of public policy statements centred on combating crimes against disabled people, as well as racial, religious, homophobic and transphobic hate crime.

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said: “Social media can be used to educate, entertain and enlighten, but there are also people who use it to bully, intimidate and harass.

“Ignorance is not a defence and perceived anonymity is not an escape. Those who commit these acts, or encourage others to do the same, can and will be prosecuted.”

I guess you know all of this because you've been banned for doing much of what's described.

[JackieD]

I guess you know all of this because you've been banned for doing much of what's described.

You have been warned, I have screenshot every single one of your posts

[sami]

 

[Jane]

You have been warned, I have screenshot every single one of your posts

But you realize, don't you, that in order to make head or tail of the contents, and to see what it is I've found it necessary to respond to, they'll need to be accompanied by everything you've posted to me.

[JackieD]

But you realize, don't you, that in order to make head or tail of the contents, and to see what it is I've found it necessary to respond to, they'll need to be accompanied by everything you've posted to me.

Perfect and alongside other posters complaints regarding your behavior towards me

Your behaviour and the way you address other posters because they won't agree with you is totally
unacceptable

As you can see you are breaking the law and you still haven't retracted the lies you posted about me

You've had your chance

[Jane]

Perfect and alongside other posters complaints regarding your behavior towards me

Your behaviour and the way you address other posters because they won't agree with you is totally
unacceptable

As you can see you are breaking the law and you still haven't retracted the lies you posted about me

You've had your chance

Interesting Jackie. The only other supporter I interact with on a regular basis is Lookout, and unless you can provide proof of her complaints against me, I'm willing to bet there aren't any. If Lookout has anything to say to me she'll say it to my face, NOT behind my back. You seem to have a very mixed up view of who I am. As I've told you frequently, the only reason I respond to you is when you attack me, which you do frequently. If you don't like what I say, put me on ignore, just as I'm doing to you.

[JackieD]

Interesting Jackie. The only other supporter I interact with on a regular basis is Lookout, and unless you can provide proof of her complaints against me, I'm willing to bet there aren't any. If Lookout has anything to say to me she'll say it to my face, NOT behind my back. You seem to have a very mixed up view of who I am. As I've told you frequently, the only reason I respond to you is when you attack me, which you do frequently. If you don't like what I say, put me on ignore, just as I'm doing to you.

That's good putting me on ignore so I Dont have to put up with your aggressive behavior anymore

[Jan]

Back to the thread .

If you are researching a book and write to a convicted murderer for information , how can you complain when the person sends you information that you have requested ? I am more worried by the claim that EP allegedly showed her pictures of the twins ? Surely that is not acceptable ? Personally I am thinking that was very risky , what if that picture had fallen into the wrong hands ? And if it proves his guilt then that could have been shown to the judges and no appeals would have been entertained ? End of .

Btw can I just say one thing , I do think the personal insults and inferences about anyone who writes to Jeremy is out of order . If someone writes to him (talking in general here not about anyone in particular) it is because they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice , and even those who have changed their minds must agree  with this. No one would write to someone they thought was guilty . So ok you might think they are wrong but to tar every person with some perverted brush , or even imply it’s because they fancy him , is pretty shortsighted in my opinion. And yes these people may be wrong , or change their minds, or just be genuinely interested in trying to get to the truth. But to insult them with the comments made on here is very below the belt . Imo

[David1819]

Back to the thread .

If you are researching a book and write to a convicted murderer for information , how can you complain when the person sends you information that you have requested ? I am more worried by the claim that EP allegedly showed her pictures of the twins ? Surely that is not acceptable ? Personally I am thinking that was very risky , what if that picture had fallen into the wrong hands ? And if it proves his guilt then that could have been shown to the judges and no appeals would have been entertained ? End of .

Btw can I just say one thing , I do think the personal insults and inferences about anyone who writes to Jeremy is out of order . If someone writes to him (talking in general here not about anyone in particular) it is because they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice , and even those who have changed their minds must agree  with this. No one would write to someone they thought was guilty . So ok you might think they are wrong but to tar every person with some perverted brush , or even imply it’s because they fancy him , is pretty shortsighted in my opinion. And yes these people may be wrong , or change their minds, or just be genuinely interested in trying to get to the truth. But to insult them with the comments made on here is very below the belt . Imo

The pictures CAL is talking about were shown in court. They don't prove what is claimed. As far as I know she never mentioned this photo in her book (correct me if I am wrong).