Author Topic: PEN PAL FROM HELL Jeremy Bamber sent me hundreds of twisted letters from prison  (Read 30643 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Back to the thread .

If you are researching a book and write to a convicted murderer for information , how can you complain when the person sends you information that you have requested ? I am more worried by the claim that EP allegedly showed her pictures of the twins ? Surely that is not acceptable ? Personally I am thinking that was very risky , what if that picture had fallen into the wrong hands ? And if it proves his guilt then that could have been shown to the judges and no appeals would have been entertained ? End of .

Btw can I just say one thing , I do think the personal insults and inferences about anyone who writes to Jeremy is out of order . If someone writes to him (talking in general here not about anyone in particular) it is because they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice , and even those who have changed their minds must agree  with this. No one would write to someone they thought was guilty . So ok you might think they are wrong but to tar every person with some perverted brush , or even imply it’s because they fancy him , is pretty shortsighted in my opinion. And yes these people may be wrong , or change their minds, or just be genuinely interested in trying to get to the truth. But to insult them with the comments made on here is very below the belt . Imo


I hardly think that anything controversial would be sent through the post. I feel certain they wouldn't have left the place where they reside. Even though she was given permission to see them, chances of her being left alone with them are probably remote. She may even have had to hand over her phone to ensure pictures weren't taken.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Back to the thread .

If you are researching a book and write to a convicted murderer for information , how can you complain when the person sends you information that you have requested ? I am more worried by the claim that EP allegedly showed her pictures of the twins ? Surely that is not acceptable ? Personally I am thinking that was very risky , what if that picture had fallen into the wrong hands ? And if it proves his guilt then that could have been shown to the judges and no appeals would have been entertained ? End of .

Btw can I just say one thing , I do think the personal insults and inferences about anyone who writes to Jeremy is out of order . If someone writes to him (talking in general here not about anyone in particular) it is because they believe there has been a miscarriage of justice , and even those who have changed their minds must agree  with this. No one would write to someone they thought was guilty . So ok you might think they are wrong but to tar every person with some perverted brush , or even imply it’s because they fancy him , is pretty shortsighted in my opinion. And yes these people may be wrong , or change their minds, or just be genuinely interested in trying to get to the truth. But to insult them with the comments made on here is very below the belt . Imo

She hasn't complained
She was allows to view the pictures - they didn't send them to her.
She said it proved guilt to HER!

You don't have to think he's innocent to write to him, she made it clear she was writing a book - he didn't have to write back.

I agree with your comments Re: writing to Bamber BUT yhe insults towards CAL have been disgusting and vile. She's an author and wrote a book, that's what authors do. If you're going to insult CAL then same should be levelled at Scott Lomax. Can't have it both ways!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Scott Lomax continues corresponding with Jeremy, does CAL ??

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Scott Lomax continues corresponding with Jeremy, does CAL ??
scotti unlike bob w  has not seen the light yet,bob was a one time champion of jb,s cause

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
She hasn't complained
She was allows to view the pictures - they didn't send them to her.
She said it proved guilt to HER!

You don't have to think he's innocent to write to him, she made it clear she was writing a book - he didn't have to write back.

I agree with your comments Re: writing to Bamber BUT yhe insults towards CAL have been disgusting and vile. She's an author and wrote a book, that's what authors do. If you're going to insult CAL then same should be levelled at Scott Lomax. Can't have it both ways!

What comments about CAL have been vile

She is happy for a national newspaper to print lies about JB stating the lies came from her

That is dispicable behaviour

All to make money

The FACTS

She will never be able to provide said letters as they don’t exist

She is a coward because she won’t address the lies

I hope someone buys the book and sues her for being dishonest

She must be desperate for cash
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
scotti unlike bob w  has not seen the light yet,bob was a one time champion of jb,s cause






The wet-suit and bicycle put me off BW's way of thinking.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490





The wet-suit and bicycle put me off BW's way of thinking.
yes but theres no proof he wasnt right and vice versa

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
yes but theres no proof he wasnt right and vice versa






There was never proof that he was right either.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781





There was never proof that he was right either.


It doesn't matter. Jeremy wasn't convicted on a wet suit.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676

It doesn't matter. Jeremy wasn't convicted on a wet suit.





Where ? When ? Blimey have you all been on the wacky baccy ?  :o :o

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490





There was never proof that he was right either.
yes but you must admit he did consider both sides of the argument thats how he reached his conclusion

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
yes but you must admit he did consider both sides of the argument thats how he reached his conclusion






Because he believed RWB, that other silly old man ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781




Where ? When ? Blimey have you all been on the wacky baccy ?  :o :o


NO! Why? Last I heard, it was a combo of Julie and a silencer which convicted him.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676

NO! Why? Last I heard, it was a combo of Julie and a silencer which convicted him.





According to Sami, he believes that the bicycle and wet-suit played a part just because BW said so  ::)

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781




According to Sami, he believes that the bicycle and wet-suit played a part just because BW said so  ::)


And Sami is perfectly entitled to think so.