0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
David, I think that's a photograph from later on.
No. It was taken on the 7th. The photo taken later on is below
It is definitely significant, Kaldin. It is discussed here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9559.30.html Photographs of the gun cupboard were taken by Bird. The negative strips which include said pictures have been cut and removed sometime between 2001 and 2012. Full strips of negatives had been cut into partial and sliced strips by 2012. The strips were tampered with on several occasions by EP with more being removed each time. The number of negatives dwindling each time some expert inspected them on behalf of the defence. Peter Sutherst was one of the experts. Prior to each visit, EP have cut and removed negatives. The following, absolute gem of a quote regarding this issue, reveals the mendacity around this case: "As stated above, on the occasions when the negative strips have been cut short, the subject matter(with the exception of the gun cupboard) is not of significance to the issues which may affect the safety of the conviction." Parse that statement. No explanation is offered as to how the CCRC managed to conclude that negatives that they hadn't seen were of no significance. No explanation given by EP for unprecedented tampering with evidence on an ongoing basis over years. Each time a defence expert inspected the slides pertaining to some upcoming appeal/submission, EP had "curated" the negatives prior to the visit. The number of negatives was reduced every time they were inspected. Where the issues were so glaring that even gatekeepers like the CCRC couldn't completely ignore it, they stick an admission into brackets whilst skirting around it by telling you that it doesn't really matter. The CCRC literally admit that the missing negatives of the gun cupboard are significant to the safety of the conviction. The missing negatives are missing because EP removed them prior to inspection for unknown reasons. They frame words around this to make it appear unimportant but what they are actually saying is this: "The negative strips of the gun cupboard have been cut short by EP. The CCRC considers this of significance to the safety of the conviction." There is nothing that is contradicted by the CCRC in the above statement made by me. The missing negatives that show the state of the gun cupboard, that you refer to, have been cut and removed by EP so I am sure it is of huge significance. The cupboard in which the relatives "found" the silencer had pictures taken of it but EP have removed them in unsatisfactorily explained circumstances.
Thank you Gringo I like posting your comment on my Twitter feed
So you think the photo is an accurate record of the gun cupboard on 7th August. The door is open and there's a gun been taken out?There is a table which is somewhat in the way of the gun cupboard door - perhaps that's what PC Bird meant.
This photo is mentioned in the trial transcripts as being taken on the 7th of August. Its not a question of I think. I know.
So the gun cupboard was searched that day then. I thought it hadn't been.
Yes, four officers looked inside it. Golding, Delgardo, Collins and Woodcock.
I was going to interrupt and say 5 officers looked in the cupboard.
Looked, not searched the silencer was hid at the back of the cupboard.
