Conflicting Statements

[ILB]

am I still being ignored cazza, you had some good points. Except not liking it when someone's opinion differed to yours.

[Jane]

You are quite simply barking mad

I have never been with Jeremy or asked to visit Jeremy to be jilted by him

Before you make yourself look ever more stupid check your FACTS on the open forum with Ngb

"You are quite simply barking mad" is clearly a projection of yourself.

"I have never been with Jeremy"? Mmm. That's a really interesting turn of phrase implying that -sadly?- there had been no 'conjugals'. You would not have needed to visit him in order to be told that your services were no longer required. Such could have been achieved perfectly well by letter. Jilted is jilted.

Before you make yourself look ever more stupid, perhaps you should refrain from posting?

[guest7363]

You are quite simply barking mad

I have never been with Jeremy or asked to visit Jeremy to be jilted by him

Before you make yourself look ever more stupid check your FACTS on the open forum with Ngb

Ok we will stick to Dumped or got rid of then if you like them word’s better. either way he hadn’t any further use for you.

[sami]

Ok we will stick to Dumped or got rid of then if you like them word’s better. either way he hadn’t any further use for you.

[guest7363]

You are quite simply barking mad

I have never been with Jeremy or asked to visit Jeremy to be jilted by him

Before you make yourself look ever more stupid check your FACTS on the open forum with Ngb

You we’re sending him money, You was his little star. then he praises you for buttering Simon McKay up and called you his naughty campaigner he didn’t want you winding people up with your cooing, then he asks you to answer the phone, then as I say he dumped you.  Didn’t he dump you over Lorna Lake or something?

[sami]

You we’re sending him money, You was his little star. then he praises you for buttering Simon McKay up and called you his naughty campaigner he didn’t want you winding people up with your cooing, then he asks you to answer the phone, then as I say he dumped you.  Didn’t he dump you over Lorna Lake or something?

wow,i tell you rj no one could get money out of me and certainly not someone who,s sitting in the nick.maybe the jehovah,s witnesses cause i pay them not to knock on my door

[Jane]

You we’re sending him money, You was his little star. then he praises you for buttering Simon McKay up and called you his naughty campaigner he didn’t want you winding people up with your cooing, then he asks you to answer the phone, then as I say he dumped you.  Didn’t he dump you over Lorna Lake or something?

Jackie might be wise -very difficult, if not, impossible, I know- to remember that which she giveth out shall be returned, at the very least, in triplicate.

[lookout]

Jackie might be wise -very difficult, if not, impossible, I know- to remember that which she giveth out shall be returned, at the very least, in triplicate.

Let's face it Jane, it wouldn't matter who it was they'd still get it in the neck if they stepped foot on this forum claiming innocent.

[Jane]

Let's face it Jane, it wouldn't matter who it was they'd still get it in the neck if they stepped foot on this forum claiming innocent.

Oh, come now, Lookout. Surely it depends on an individuals approach, doesn't it? And we ALL know what Jackie's is, don't we?

[lookout]

Oh, come now, Lookout. Surely it depends on an individuals approach, doesn't it? And we ALL know what Jackie's is, don't we?

Well it's clear to me that you're not very well up on " customer relations ".

[Jane]

Well it's clear to me that you're not very well up on " customer relations ".

Which makes you even worse if you're supporting her................and I DO mean "her" as opposed to her belief. Can you swear that you believe her to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

[Jane]

Lookout, Jackie has been asking me everyday about our PM, i didn’t want to get involved because I knew she wouldn’t like what I said, it’s the truth I stepped back from her because she not only revealed personal correspondence between her and Bamber, there was other things she did, so my own personal stance was keep away.  It’s not my fault she asked me about it.  I didn’t want to keep bringing it up, but there are plenty on here who can verify she kept asking week in and week out.

This is one of her traits, isn't it, RJ. I think she hopes to intimidate by so doing. Of course, what she never want to discuss are her own foul behaviours.

[lookout]

Which makes you even worse if you're supporting her................and I DO mean "her" as opposed to her belief. Can you swear that you believe her to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

Do you ?

[Jane]

Do you ?

I believe she posts on this forum.

[sami]

Let's face it Jane, it wouldn't matter who it was they'd still get it in the neck if they stepped foot on this forum claiming innocent.

thats not true lookout as you well know supporters and non supporters come and go