Author Topic: Conflicting Statements  (Read 80409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #405 on: December 28, 2019, 01:00:AM »
"I don't like her and she doesn't like me" - What part of her illness is that referring to?

You are unbelievable

Sometimes people who live with each other like each other some days

That does Not mean somebody is going to murder someone

Are you managing to grasp that now

By making ridiculous comments like that all your arguements look week and do not tell me to leave ‘Neil’ out of it
Who do you think you are??

Neil has spent a lot of time helping Jeremy
Fact

Have you grasped that
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #406 on: December 28, 2019, 01:31:AM »
You are unbelievable

Sometimes people who live with each other like each other some days

That does Not mean somebody is going to murder someone

Are you managing to grasp that now

By making ridiculous comments like that all your arguements look week and do not tell me to leave ‘Neil’ out of it
Who do you think you are??

Neil has spent a lot of time helping Jeremy
Fact

Have you grasped that

Jackie, I can always rely on you to make me laugh  ;D ;D. You're like a caricature  ;D ;D

Poor NGB, you only mention him to try and bolster your own posts  ::)

Have I grasped what? That Jeremy didn't like Sheila? Of course - he shot her.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #407 on: December 28, 2019, 01:32:AM »
By the way, randomly typing FACT, doesn't make something a fact.

Have you grasped that yet?
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #408 on: December 28, 2019, 08:02:AM »
But my useless opinion meant enough for you to start sending me pm messages

Was that your idea or Anne’s

I cannot wait to see her get her comeuppance
I think I have a right to reply to this.  You have my permission to ask NGB,  I am not anything to do with the family, you accuse both me and Hartley of the same thing, I can’t answer for Hartley.

You want answers or me to answer my PM to you, I can remember I  PM’d you a long time back it was at the time Bamber Dumped you, I felt sorry for you and I told you so for all the work you put in, that’s basically all I can remember, your reply went down the lines of, I don’t know if Bamber is guilty or not.

Why I stopped any future correspondence with you, has proved me right.  You cannot be trusted, by that I mean, the moment Bamber DUMPED you, you sought  revenge on Bamber, someone who had confided personal information with you,  by posting his corresponding letters between you both.  So I drew a comparison between you and Julie, both of you got dumped by Bamber and both wanted revenge, only Julie chose the right path and went to the police, you decided to ditch his dirt on forum’s.

Nothing like a woman scorned is there?

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #409 on: December 28, 2019, 09:14:AM »
I think I have a right to reply to this.  You have my permission to ask NGB,  I am not anything to do with the family, you accuse both me and Hartley of the same thing, I can’t answer for Hartley.

You want answers or me to answer my PM to you, I can remember I  PM’d you a long time back it was at the time Bamber Dumped you, I felt sorry for you and I told you so for all the work you put in, that’s basically all I can remember, your reply went down the lines of, I don’t know if Bamber is guilty or not.

Why I stopped any future correspondence with you, has proved me right.  You cannot be trusted, by that I mean, the moment Bamber DUMPED you, you sought  revenge on Bamber, someone who had confided personal information with you,  by posting his corresponding letters between you both.  So I drew a comparison between you and Julie, both of you got dumped by Bamber and both wanted revenge, only Julie chose the right path and went to the police, you decided to ditch his dirt on forum’s.

Nothing like a woman scorned is there?
well put rj.disgusting that someone you helped when they were at a low point should now come and throw it in your face on an open forum,some people have no morals or principals

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #410 on: December 28, 2019, 09:26:AM »
By the way, randomly typing FACT, doesn't make something a fact.

Have you grasped that yet?
:)) :)) :))

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #411 on: December 28, 2019, 10:36:AM »
I think I have a right to reply to this.  You have my permission to ask NGB,  I am not anything to do with the family, you accuse both me and Hartley of the same thing, I can’t answer for Hartley.

You want answers or me to answer my PM to you, I can remember I  PM’d you a long time back it was at the time Bamber Dumped you, I felt sorry for you and I told you so for all the work you put in, that’s basically all I can remember, your reply went down the lines of, I don’t know if Bamber is guilty or not.

Why I stopped any future correspondence with you, has proved me right.  You cannot be trusted, by that I mean, the moment Bamber DUMPED you, you sought  revenge on Bamber, someone who had confided personal information with you,  by posting his corresponding letters between you both.  So I drew a comparison between you and Julie, both of you got dumped by Bamber and both wanted revenge, only Julie chose the right path and went to the police, you decided to ditch his dirt on forum’s.

Nothing like a woman scorned is there?

What a load of rubbish. You told me you knew the family and the reason I fell out with Jeremy was to do with the way the the ‘official’ campaign team were handling the case and I still feel exactly the same for many reasons

I have not sought revenge on Jeremy and still BELIEVE he is innocent
You post as if you know he is guilty which is not true FACT
You post with such venom which is unnatural for someone who does not know if Jeremy is guilty but would rather choose to believe a pathological liar ?
You also like to take cheap shots at an impartial poster in the hope he will leave the forum
It’s absolutely disgusting
« Last Edit: December 28, 2019, 10:50:AM by JackieD »
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #412 on: December 28, 2019, 10:40:AM »
It certainly seems to me that Jackie believes that Jeremy is innocent, so I don't where this "scorned woman" business has come from.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #413 on: December 28, 2019, 10:48:AM »
Jackie, I can always rely on you to make me laugh  ;D ;D. You're like a caricature  ;D ;D

Poor NGB, you only mention him to try and bolster your own posts  ::)

Have I grasped what? That Jeremy didn't like Sheila? Of course - he shot her.

Poor NGB, Neil who has been treated appalling and trolled by people who think Jeremy’s guilty

You have the audacity to tell me to leave Neil out of it
You are a nobody who has changed her mind on jeremys conviction and now attack with venom anyone who thinks this is an unfair conviction
Proper nasty behaviour and you spend hours doing it even though you ‘know’ Jeremy is guilty and in the right place

Neil has seen hundreds and thousands of pieces of evidence about the case you and I have never seen
FACT
But chose to stand by him
FACT

So don’t ever tell me to leave Neil out of it because what he has done for Jeremy has been amazing
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #414 on: December 28, 2019, 10:49:AM »
What a load of rubbish. You told me you knew the family and the reason I fell out with Jeremy was to do with the way the the ‘official’ campaign team and I still feel exactly the same for many reasons

I have not sought revenge on Jeremy and still BELIEVE he is innocent
You post as if you know he is guilty which is not true FACT
You post with such venom which is unnatural for someone who does not know if Jeremy is guilty but would rather choose to believe a pathological liar ?
You also like to take cheap shots at an impartial poster in the hope he will leave the forum
It’s absolutely disgusting
I have met the family yes on several occasions at BHHP

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #415 on: December 28, 2019, 10:53:AM »
I have met the family yes on several occasions at BHHP
Can I ask you what you mean that you hope Ann gets her comeuppance?  What’s she done to you?  Do you take revenge out of everyone?

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #416 on: December 28, 2019, 10:53:AM »
Admitted the truth
Maybe you can help them pack there cases when the time comes

Now stop your disgraceful behaviour against impartial posters
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #417 on: December 28, 2019, 10:54:AM »
What a load of rubbish. You told me you knew the family and the reason I fell out with Jeremy was to do with the way the the ‘official’ campaign team were handling the case and I still feel exactly the same for many reasons

I have not sought revenge on Jeremy and still BELIEVE he is innocent
You post as if you know he is guilty which is not true FACT
You post with such venom which is unnatural for someone who does not know if Jeremy is guilty but would rather choose to believe a pathological liar ?
You also like to take cheap shots at an impartial poster in the hope he will leave the forum
It’s absolutely disgusting
you need to calm down take deep breaths.its no good for your blood pressure :)) :))

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #418 on: December 28, 2019, 10:57:AM »
It could have been  ;D
Here you go again Jane ‘the therapist’
You haven’t got a clue
Jeremy and Sheila clearly had a loving relationship FACT


From Jane, the therapist, to Jackie, the troll who doesn't understand that there's a difference between  "FACTS" and flatulence, making one sound very like the other.

You have been told, on numerous occasions, that "a fact" is a truth -that's "A" truth as opposed to the truth you want it to be. THAT would be a fantasy.

Not only does your vitriol to ward Julie know no bounds, you're so proud to own it that you want the whole forum to be aware. WHY, after all these years of drooling over Jeremy, do you feel the need to ask a short term member for dates of "her crimes" when they probably engraved on your heart? You only, surely, needed to email the Canadian police. I believe you once bragged here of how they'd received information of Julie's previous life and crimes.

Your ideas of what constitutes "a loving relationship" are somewhat different from the accepted norm. There's nothing to suggest any closeness in their early years -although I believe Sheila defended him from the school bus bullies when he first started school- lasted. Different ages, schools, friends, interests. I have no doubt that Jeremy loved the bragging rights her modelling years afforded him but her hasty marriage and mental illness would have put paid to that. I imagine it caused him both anger and embarrassment. I do NOT accept it to have been her illness to which he referred when he told police "I don't like her and she doesn't like me". In fact, it had NOTHING to do with it. It was in answer to their question about whom she'd rather speak with.

Having been dumped by him I'm really not certain why you still appear to be putting yourself out there on his behalf. But maybe I've got it wrong? Perhaps this is more about getting your own name out there, OR perhaps you're playing reverse psychology? Could be you're out for revenge for having been dumped? Why might I think that? Because everything you say about him does more harm, than good, to his cause. Sure you make a lot of noise but you've got nothing to say which is of any substance. It's either distorted rubbish or digs at detractors. Could be it's why you do so much in the way of name-dropping? Perhaps you hope it elevates your own status?

Anyway, I hope you'll enjoy the soon to be aired series and I wish you a happy 2020.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #419 on: December 28, 2019, 10:57:AM »
Can I ask you what you mean that you hope Ann gets her comeuppance?  What’s she done to you?  Do you take revenge out of everyone?

She was gunning for Jeremy from day one without any evidence he was responsible for the murders. If this case gets overturned on evidence relating to the silencer where does that leave the family ?
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000