Author Topic: Conflicting Statements  (Read 80436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #420 on: December 28, 2019, 10:57:AM »
Admitted the truth
Maybe you can help them pack there cases when the time comes

Now stop your disgraceful behaviour against impartial posters
Hold on a minute, go back through the posts and see who started it, you asked me about the pm I gave you my honest answer, I gave a answer why I didn’t want any further contact with you, you grassed Bamber up on both here and red, the letters are still there, you call Mugford for taking revenge, maybe you don’t see your betrayal as revenge?

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #421 on: December 28, 2019, 10:59:AM »
Hold on a minute, go back through the posts and see who started it, you asked me about the pm I gave you my honest answer, I gave a answer why I didn’t want any further contact with you, you grassed Bamber up on both here and red, the letters are still there, you call Mugford for taking revenge, maybe you don’t see your betrayal as revenge?
ahhh now that is interesting

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #422 on: December 28, 2019, 11:04:AM »
Admitted the truth
Maybe you can help them pack there cases when the time comes

Now stop your disgraceful behaviour against impartial posters
oh dear,the boots on the other foot :)

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #423 on: December 28, 2019, 11:04:AM »

From Jane, the therapist, to Jackie, the troll who doesn't understand that there's a difference between  "FACTS" and flatulence, making one sound very like the other.

You have been told, on numerous occasions, that "a fact" is a truth -that's "A" truth as opposed to the truth you want it to be. THAT would be a fantasy.

Not only does your vitriol to ward Julie know no bounds, you're so proud to own it that you want the whole forum to be aware. WHY, after all these years of drooling over Jeremy, do you feel the need to ask a short term member for dates of "her crimes" when they probably engraved on your heart? You only, surely, needed to email the Canadian police. I believe you once bragged here of how they'd received information of Julie's previous life and crimes.

Your ideas of what constitutes "a loving relationship" are somewhat different from the accepted norm. There's nothing to suggest any closeness in their early years -although I believe Sheila defended him from the school bus bullies when he first started school- lasted. Different ages, schools, friends, interests. I have no doubt that Jeremy loved the bragging rights her modelling years afforded him but her hasty marriage and mental illness would have put paid to that. I imagine it caused him both anger and embarrassment. I do NOT accept it to have been her illness to which he referred when he told police "I don't like her and she doesn't like me". In fact, it had NOTHING to do with it. It was in answer to their question about whom she'd rather speak with.

Having been dumped by him I'm really not certain why you still appear to be putting yourself out there on his behalf. But maybe I've got it wrong? Perhaps this is more about getting your own name out there, OR perhaps you're playing reverse psychology? Could be you're out for revenge for having been dumped? Why might I think that? Because everything you say about him does more harm, than good, to his cause. Sure you make a lot of noise but you've got nothing to say which is of any substance. It's either distorted rubbish or digs at detractors. Could be it's why you do so much in the way of name-dropping? Perhaps you hope it elevates your own status?

Anyway, I hope you'll enjoy the soon to be aired series and I wish you a happy 2020.

Hilarious from Jane the therapist

Try looking up the word fact and learn what it means
Then try looking up ‘I think’ and see what it means
Then try to ‘think’ less in 2020
And try to be less vile to impartial posters in 2020 although I know it must be difficult for a genuine ‘therapist’
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #424 on: December 28, 2019, 11:07:AM »
you need to calm down take deep breaths.its no good for your blood pressure :)) :))

I have perfect blood pressure W, GS, TP  ;D ;D ;D
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #425 on: December 28, 2019, 11:10:AM »
Hold on a minute, go back through the posts and see who started it, you asked me about the pm I gave you my honest answer, I gave a answer why I didn’t want any further contact with you, you grassed Bamber up on both here and red, the letters are still there, you call Mugford for taking revenge, maybe you don’t see your betrayal as revenge?

Grassed up ?

You better fill me in?

So I posted on this forum how Jeremy carried out the murders
Please let me know because I am going to be very rich
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #426 on: December 28, 2019, 11:11:AM »
Poor NGB, Neil who has been treated appalling and trolled by people who think Jeremy’s guilty

You have the audacity to tell me to leave Neil out of it
You are a nobody who has changed her mind on jeremys conviction and now attack with venom anyone who thinks this is an unfair conviction
Proper nasty behaviour and you spend hours doing it even though you ‘know’ Jeremy is guilty and in the right place

Neil has seen hundreds and thousands of pieces of evidence about the case you and I have never seen
FACT
But chose to stand by him
FACT

So don’t ever tell me to leave Neil out of it because what he has done for Jeremy has been amazing



Have you any idea how pathetic you make yourself sound?

FACT! NGB doesn't require your support. His world won't fall apart if you stop drawing him into yours at every excuse. He's perfectly capable of handling whatever gets thrown at him. If he needs further help he can get it from those more knowledgeable than you. Your enthusiastic support of him is making you look idiotic.


Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #427 on: December 28, 2019, 11:15:AM »


Have you any idea how pathetic you make yourself sound?

FACT! NGB doesn't require your support. His world won't fall apart if you stop drawing him into yours at every excuse. He's perfectly capable of handling whatever gets thrown at him. If he needs further help he can get it from those more knowledgeable than you. Your enthusiastic support of him is making you look idiotic.



 ;) ;) ;)
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #428 on: December 28, 2019, 11:18:AM »
Hilarious from Jane the therapist

Try looking up the word fact and learn what it means
Then try looking up ‘I think’ and see what it means
Then try to ‘think’ less in 2020
And try to be less vile to impartial posters in 2020 although I know it must be difficult for a genuine ‘therapist’


Jackie the troll, A "fact" is something known to be true. It rather rules out most of what you type. I follow Descartes. "I think, therefore I am". You very clearly don't, ergo, you're NOT. Perhaps you should try it sometime. I do recognize a GENUINE troll when I see one.

Oh, and for the record, I don't respond to vile impartials.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2019, 11:25:AM by Jane »

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #429 on: December 28, 2019, 11:27:AM »


Have you any idea how pathetic you make yourself sound?

FACT! NGB doesn't require your support. His world won't fall apart if you stop drawing him into yours at every excuse. He's perfectly capable of handling whatever gets thrown at him. If he needs further help he can get it from those more knowledgeable than you. Your enthusiastic support of him is making you look idiotic.
And the fact, she betrayed Bamber like Julie did,  when he jilted them both when they were no longer of use.  She’s pot calling Kettle Black

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33785
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #430 on: December 28, 2019, 11:41:AM »
And the fact, she betrayed Bamber like Julie did,  when he jilted them both when they were no longer of use.  She’s pot calling Kettle Black


So she she may have been putting the boot into Jeremy for a long time? Of note, too, is how, at every opportunity is used the FACT that people -usually men!!- have pm'd her. What's NEVER made clear, although the implications are!!, are the reasons for it. Noted, too, is that she's now seems to be implying NGB into her fantasy world of being adored. Hoping to make Jeremy aware of what he's missing, perhaps?

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #431 on: December 28, 2019, 11:57:AM »
And the fact, she betrayed Bamber like Julie did,  when he jilted them both when they were no longer of use.  She’s pot calling Kettle Black


You are quite simply barking mad

I have never been with Jeremy or asked to visit Jeremy to be jilted by him

Before you make yourself look ever more stupid check your FACTS on the open forum with Ngb
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #432 on: December 28, 2019, 11:59:AM »
Totally lost interest now be are not even discussing the case. I am off out from some lunch and shopping again  :)
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #433 on: December 28, 2019, 12:20:PM »
Poor NGB, Neil who has been treated appalling and trolled by people who think Jeremy’s guilty

You have the audacity to tell me to leave Neil out of it
You are a nobody who has changed her mind on jeremys conviction and now attack with venom anyone who thinks this is an unfair conviction
Proper nasty behaviour and you spend hours doing it even though you ‘know’ Jeremy is guilty and in the right place

Neil has seen hundreds and thousands of pieces of evidence about the case you and I have never seen
FACT
But chose to stand by him
FACT

So don’t ever tell me to leave Neil out of it because what he has done for Jeremy has been amazing

Jackie - take your pseudo FACTS and stick them where the sun doesn't shine. Like I said, stop using NGB to bolster your posts. I know ever well that he knows lots about the case and I have discussed various aspects with him myself. YOU, however, know sweet FA and have some king of jealous axe to grind with Julie Mugford and you're trying to make RJ's PM sound sinister - stupid woman!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #434 on: December 28, 2019, 12:23:PM »
Totally lost interest now be are not even discussing the case. I am off out from some lunch and shopping again  :)

You never do discuss the case.
Few people have the imagination for reality