Author Topic: The ITV Drama  (Read 234794 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1185 on: January 15, 2020, 10:18:PM »
its the whisky lookout :)





See his lack of respect/manners in the mortuary ? He was about to light a cigarette. Sheesh.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1186 on: January 15, 2020, 10:18:PM »
I don't much care for the slimy Stan either. See how he's getting AE on-side ? Right up his street.


He puts it across as a decent, thoughtful guy who looks beyond the obvious and didn't treat people like he knew best. Yeh. I can see why you wouldn't like him

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1187 on: January 15, 2020, 10:21:PM »




See his lack of respect/manners in the mortuary ? He was about to light a cigarette. Sheesh.
 


There wasn't a universal smoking ban back then.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1188 on: January 15, 2020, 10:36:PM »
 


There wasn't a universal smoking ban back then.





There is in a mortuary because of chemicals.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1189 on: January 15, 2020, 10:39:PM »




There is in a mortuary because of chemicals.
iam sure he can be forgiven considering the situation.i know i would faint not long after the first incision :)) :)) :))

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1190 on: January 15, 2020, 10:40:PM »




There is in a mortuary because of chemicals.

In which case he'd either never previously been in one or other pathologists never insisted.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1191 on: January 15, 2020, 10:43:PM »
In which case he'd either never previously been in one or other pathologists never insisted.






His own common sense should have told him.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1192 on: January 15, 2020, 10:44:PM »





His own common sense should have told him.
yes but that was tainted by the whisky :)

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1193 on: January 15, 2020, 10:45:PM »





His own common sense should have told him.

Why? It may have been something he'd always done.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1194 on: January 15, 2020, 10:47:PM »
yes but that was tainted by the whisky :)






Yes, an addled brain.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1195 on: January 15, 2020, 10:48:PM »
Nothing should cloud the judgement in a job like that.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1196 on: January 15, 2020, 10:50:PM »
Nothing should cloud the judgement in a job like that.
especially a round of golf

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1197 on: January 15, 2020, 11:06:PM »
Any comments on the wounds they portrayed on nevilles arms saying done with rifle butt ? They were gouges and there would have been blood and skin and flesh on the rifle , but there wasn’t ?

Also the burns ? They seemed to think they had been done at the time of the crime ? Not sure that was established ?

Bad portrayal of the window situation I think . Not what Barlow said when he went to test it. And it never would have come up in appeal if that was that simple.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1198 on: January 15, 2020, 11:13:PM »
Any comments on the wounds they portrayed on nevilles arms saying done with rifle butt ? They were gouges and there would have been blood and skin and flesh on the rifle , but there wasn’t ?

Also the burns ? They seemed to think they had been done at the time of the crime ? Not sure that was established ?

Bad portrayal of the window situation I think . Not what Barlow said when he went to test it. And it never would have come up in appeal if that was that simple.
i think it was shown that the marks were not fresh cause they showed signs of the healing process
« Last Edit: January 15, 2020, 11:14:PM by sami »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1199 on: January 16, 2020, 12:17:AM »
Any comments on the wounds they portrayed on nevilles arms saying done with rifle butt ? They were gouges and there would have been blood and skin and flesh on the rifle , but there wasn’t ?

Also the burns ? They seemed to think they had been done at the time of the crime ? Not sure that was established ?

Bad portrayal of the window situation I think . Not what Barlow said when he went to test it. And it never would have come up in appeal if that was that simple.


42.

The examination of Nevill Bamber's body also revealed black eyes and a broken nose, linear bruising to the cheeks, lacerations to the head.

Linear type bruising to the right forearm, bruising to the left wrist and forearm and three circular burn type marks to the back.

The linear marks were consistent with Mr Bamber having been struck with a long blunt object, possibly a gun.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.