Any comments on the wounds they portrayed on nevilles arms saying done with rifle butt ? They were gouges and there would have been blood and skin and flesh on the rifle , but there wasn’t ?
Also the burns ? They seemed to think they had been done at the time of the crime ? Not sure that was established ?
Bad portrayal of the window situation I think . Not what Barlow said when he went to test it. And it never would have come up in appeal if that was that simple.
42.
The examination of Nevill Bamber's body also revealed black eyes and a broken nose, linear bruising to the cheeks, lacerations to the head.
Linear type bruising to the right forearm, bruising to the left wrist and forearm and three circular burn type marks to the back.
The linear marks were consistent with Mr Bamber having been struck with a long blunt object, possibly a gun.