what have you just said can be interpreted in both two ways. The prosecution can interpret it as Jeremy Bamber trying to cover his arse by giving the police the idea that Shelia is competent in using guns. Or it can be argued that she did have target practice. Look at it from this perspective, all of us here were not involved with the Bamber family pre August 7th 1985, we can't just rely on relatives who only intermiddetly saw them over the years. None of us have a clue
You're right. We were not involved with the Bamber family before the massacre, but some of us are doing more than relying on what was said by relatives. By taking a look at Sheila's life we can get some clues.
A girl less inclined toward country pursuits it would be difficult to find. Certainly, she accompanied the family to a shoot in Scotland -I mean, given the chance, who of us wouldn't?! Brilliant time of year. Wonderful scenery. Great 'apres' shoot parties- she may well have posed with a gun. She may even, on occasion, have shot one in the air. It doesn't mean she was gun competent. It doesn't mean she could break and load. It doesn't denote an interest in either country pursuits in general or guns in particular .....................NEITHER does her chosen lifestyle. Just how much further away could she get from country life than London. No chance there for huntin', shootin', and fishin', instead she choose girly pursuits such as secretarials, hairdressing, and finally, modelling. Not that she made a success of any of them. When all else failed and she needed to earn, she turned to cleaning houses and waiting at tables rather than leaving London and returning to rural Essex where she'd have had security from the business her parents offered to set her up in, plus a house they'd have given her. She appears to have been scratching around for every penny. From where do you imagine she'd have found the money for shooting lessons if she'd even had time to think it was something she might enjoy. Given that she didn't even like her boys to play with guns, I suspect the thought never crossed her mind that she might enjoy shooting.
Then, of course, there's her well documented lack of coordination and her inability to place beans on toast -one shouldn't be surprised that she failed miserably at both secretarials and hairdressing. She'd have been hitting all the wrong keys, and God knows what she'd have done with a pair of scissors in her hands!!! Odd, that every one of the shots fired from that gun found a home, isn't it? I'd have said that the shooter knew exactly how to aim and fire a gun, and had the ability to reload with confidence when necessary. I'm also willing to bet that person wasn't Sheila.