Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[Adam]

The police could only submit one moderator to Huntingdon. So no benefit in having two with them.

[lookout]

After learning that something is going on in the family home anyone would be entitled to be in a " muddle " and the last thing you'd be thinking about is jotting down times ! The uncertainty of a situation alone is confusing enough. JB wouldn't have known if he was on his head or his heels especially after being told to " go back to bed ". Support ? I don't think so, and he had no-one else.

It would have appeared that JM was never expecting anything to go wrong as regards WHF particularly involving JB otherwise she wouldn't have been so quick in telling him to go back to bed, would she ?

[lookout]

Where are " Taff " Jones's notes ? Where are his writings/reports on the case ?

[Caroline]

Where are " Taff " Jones's notes ? Where are his writings/reports on the case ?

You think that because they aren’t on this forum, they don’t exist? 

[Adam]

From the OS -

'Disclosed paperwork shows that there were two moderators being examined on the same day, each with different contaminates and having different characteristics. This means that we can be certain there were two.'

-----------

Are the OS saying the police fabricated two moderators. Then submitted both to the lab team at different times. One with blood in, one with paint on. Then asked the relatives to say they found one moderator?

The lab team examined two moderators on the same day & merged the results to relate to one moderator. Meaning they are part of the industrial frame.

[lookout]

You think that because they aren’t on this forum, they don’t exist? 

No, I'm just asking where they are and waiting for some bright spark to tell me, that's all.

[David1819]

You're about ten years too late. This and similar questions have already been asked (and continue to be so).

And the logical answer is. There was no call to bring up in the first place.

[lookout]

From the OS -

'Disclosed paperwork shows that there were two moderators being examined on the same day, each with different contaminates and having different characteristics. This means that we can be certain there were two.'

-----------

Are the OS saying the police fabricated two moderators. Then submitted both to the lab team at different times. One with blood in, one with paint on. Then asked the relatives to say they found one moderator?

The lab team examined two moderators on the same day & merged the results to relate to one moderator. Meaning they are part of the industrial frame.

There should by rights only have been one silencer that was expected to feature, the one with paint on it to show the jury that " there had been a struggle " resulting in the Aga being affected by scratches. But-------on the day of the murders when the photographer was there taking pics of the Aga and its surround, there were no marks/scratches on it as they were found some time after, along with the silencer and its paint. 

[Adam]

Hopefully the OS will go into more detail about the two moderators being examined at the same time.

[David1819]

Myalls pocket has a time of 3:39am for departure and 3:45am for arrival. However that would mean CAO7 travelled at around 80mph.

If we go by Bonnets time of departure. Then we have a more realistic speed 50mph

[Adam]

The OS say that the relatives handed in a moderator. See reply 479.

This would have had blood and paint on, otherwise there was no point handing it in. The relatives in their WS's say the moderator they found had blood & paint on. The police would have handed this to the lab team.

So why would the police need to submit a second moderator to the lab team?

[lookout]

Hopefully the OS will go into more detail about the two moderators being examined at the same time.

Not forgetting that one was also damaged too but I don't know if it was the one with paint on it or not---------for authenticity you understand.

[Roch]

And the logical answer is. There was no call to bring up in the first place.

At face value, that would seem to be the most logical answer. However, this case is something else.

[Caroline]

At face value, that would seem to be the most logical answer. However, this case is something else.

It's been MADE to be something else.

[Roch]

It's been MADE to be something else.

May I respectfully remind you, that is your OPINION