Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[Reader]

My conclusion is that there was no radio communication at 03:30; it is a lie, . . .

You also asserted (according to Roch) "Personal radios were notoriously unreliable in the 1970/80 period, with a transmission range of between 1-2 miles depending on factors such as the weather and obstructions in the path of the signal." However, Pc West asserted that he used a radio link between Chelmsford police station and Witham police station, rather than a personally carried radio.

[Adam]

If the CT is saying Jeremy called the police at 3.36am, then he called Julie beforehand.

Not for advice but to 'hear a friendly voice'.

[Caroline]

If the CT is saying Jeremy called the police at 3.36am, then he called Julie beforehand.

Not for advice but to 'hear a friendly voice'.

Exactly! But he denies that - can't have it both ways!

[Adam]

If he got Nevill's call around 3.10am, then called the police at 3.36am, that is 26 minutes.

Did he have session under his sun bed?

[Caroline]

If he got Nevill's call around 3.10am, then called the police at 3.36am, that is 26 minutes.

Did he have session under his sun bed?

Adam! 

[Reader]

It does not matter when Jeremy called Julie. Calling her to 'hear a friendly voice' could be done before or after calling the police.

But a bit weird getting a frantic 4 second call from Nevill, then calling Julie straight away.

He evidently tried to call Nevill back first. Unable to get back to Nevill, he wasn't sure what to do and so he telephoned Julie for advice. He eventually spoke to her, but she wasn't helpful.

[Caroline]

He evidently tried to call Nevill back first. Unable to get back to Nevill, he wasn't sure what to do and so he telephoned Julie for advice. He eventually spoke to her, but she wasn't helpful.

He denies calling Julie first - even now!

[Reader]

Then he's mistaken. The earliest available evidence (from both him and Julie) indicates he telephoned Julie before calling the police.

[Adam]

He evidently tried to call Nevill back first. Unable to get back to Nevill, he wasn't sure what to do and so he telephoned Julie for advice. He eventually spoke to her, but she wasn't helpful.

He said he phoned her to 'hear a friendly voice'. And phoned her after the police. Although he is now saying he phoned her before the police.

[Caroline]

Then he's mistaken. The earliest available evidence (from both him and Julie) indicates he telephoned Julie before calling the police.

Mistaken? Really? You think he's JUST mistaken? 

[Caroline]

He said he phoned her to 'hear a friendly voice'. And phoned her after the police. Although he is now saying he phoned her before the police.

No, NOW he is saying he phoned her 'after' the police - the time scales being claimed here make that impossible.

[Adam]

Julie did give Jeremy some advice - 'go back to bed'.

[Adam]

No, NOW he is saying he phoned her 'after' the police - the time scales being claimed here make that impossible.

He's now indirectly saying he phoned her before the police. But does not want to draw attention to it.  The Mirror won't focus on it & just publicise Nevill's call claim.

[Adam]

The CT focus on Nevill's call because it creates maximum publicity.

It's not some boring technicality. It shows Jeremy is innocent & the biggest MOJ & Industrial frame ever has occurred. Over 34 years.

Correct or not, the media will love it 

[Adam]

Nevill's call is also easy for the public to understand. People not familiar with the case will understand how a call makes Jeremy innocent.

The Mirror & other similar newspapers won't want to confuse the public with anything too complicated.

People that read the Nevill's call articles may be attracted to the case.