Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[Caroline]

others have accused him of a lot worse

In Mike's eyes - there is NOTHING worse! 

[sami]

In Mike's eyes - this is NOTHING worse! 

lets hope he doesnt see it.

[nugnug]

Who is Bill Robertson anyway..

hes Bill Robertson thats all we really need to know.

[lookout]

Since when has Mike been a member of the CT ??

[Roch]

hes Bill Robertson thats all we really need to know.

The accusations that he is Mike Tesko were absurd. He spent three years studying the first hour of the case from a police perspective, after overhearing some officers or ex officers laughing at how much of a stitch-up the conviction was. His early posts are about the first hour of the case.

[Steve_uk]

hes Bill Robertson thats all we really need to know.

If he's got any information which will exculpate Jeremy Bamber he can post it again here.

[lookout]

Bill has pm'd me over the years and has proved to have been accurate with his findings.

[Caroline]

Bill has pm'd me over the years and has proved to have been accurate with his findings.

Really? Such as?

[David1819]

Bill is logging into the forum, but not posting anything.

At least try and defend your position.

[lookout]

Really? Such as?

That's between Bill and myself.

[Caroline]

That's between Bill and myself.

So just your word that he's accurate?   

[Caroline]

Bill is logging into the forum, but not posting anything.

At least try and defend your position.

Yes, I noticed that too. just checking to see how the propaganda is going down! 

[Jan]

How lovely that you are all still here and still arguing in such a friendly way  a bit like groundhog day or Brexit .

[lookout]

How lovely that you are all still here and still arguing in such a friendly way  a bit like groundhog day or Brexit .

Aw, Hi Jan, lovely to see you I hope you're well.

[sami]

Aw, Hi Jan, lovely to see you I hope you're well.

thats not fair lookout,ive posted after several months and you never gave me the same welcome back