Last chance: Questions on the relatives fabricating the silencer:

[maggie]

I used to like rectifying other people's posts. 

Happy memories, Roch.   

[Steve_uk]

What evidence that the relatives had access to Sheila's blood ?

Well sending me lots of PV's does not mean the police had stored Sheila's blood.

Not sure why the police would store it. But it is more likely the police would have Sheila's blood than the relatives. Which is why I said it had to be a joint effort. Providing the police had Sheila's blood in a fridge. Was it next to the Semi skimmed milk ?

No allegedly in her bloodstained knickers soaking in the bucket.

[Adam]

No allegedly in her bloodstained knickers soaking in the bucket.

 

[Roch]

Happy memories, Roch.   

It was all about brackets Maggie.  Brackets were everything.   

[maggie]

It was all about brackets Maggie.  Brackets were everything.   

[David1819]

Well sending me lots of PV's does not mean the police had stored Sheila's blood.

I'm afraid it does Adam. That's why you need to dig a little deeper than a book written 23 years ago.

[Adam]

I'm afraid it does Adam. That's why you need to dig a little deeper than a book written 23 years ago.

What's Wilkes's book got to do with this ?

Great. I've always wanted to see a document that the police had stored Sheila's blood.

I assume Steve was right and you are referring to soaked blood in a bucket. Therefore the claim the relatives had access to Sheila's blood has been dismissed.

The relatives must have asked Stan Jones for Sheila's blood.

The other option is Stan Jones fabricated a silencer himself and asked the relatives to create false WS's and say they found the silencer.

Either way the relatives & Stan Jones had to work together. Which makes the frame even more unlikely.

[Adam]

As mentioned, there is always the chance the relatives found the silencer with paint & Sheila's blood on. But as also mentioned, unlikely.

[David1819]

I assume Steve was right and you are referring to soaked blood in a bucket. Therefore the claim the relatives had access to Sheila's blood has been dismissed.

The knickers were covered in Sheila's menstrual blood. So they indeed had access to her blood.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8033.msg394832.html#msg394832

Four ballistics experts have testified that the wounds to Sheila where contact wounds caused by the threaded end of the rifle. Not the smooth and wider silencer. Thus the blood getting inside the silencer via being shot is ruled out.

[Jane]

No allegedly in her bloodstained knickers soaking in the bucket.

"SOAKING" being the operative word. How many parts blood to water would there have been by the time the knickers were extricated from the pail. If she's rinsed surplus away prior to soaking it reduces blood content still further.

[guest7363]

"SOAKING" being the operative word. How many parts blood to water would there have been by the time the knickers were extricated from the pail. If she's rinsed surplus away prior to soaking it reduces blood content still further.

Ive heard of a quote "its like getting blood out of a stone"  conspiracy thearists have invented a new one, "its like getting blood out of washed knickers" 

[Jane]

Ive heard of a quote "its like getting blood out of a stone"  conspiracy thearists have invented a new one, "its like getting blood out of washed knickers" 

  WONDERFUL, Justice!!!!!!!

[guest2181]

Ive heard of a quote "its like getting blood out of a stone"  conspiracy thearists have invented a new one, "its like getting blood out of washed knickers" 

Very good. 

[Adam]

David knows there was no chance of the relatives asking Stan Jones to bring Sheila's blood to Oak Farm for them. Or of the relatives asking Stan Jones to give them crime scene information and photos, although these questions were not answered by him. 

The above means they did not fabricate the silencer which is a big breakthrough.  Which is why David is still pursuing that the relatives got Sheila's blood from a soaking bucket of clothes & created the back splatter effect inside the silencer.

Didn't AE mention the bucket in her WS ? Strange thing to do if she used it's contents to fabricate evidence.

[susan]

David knows there was no chance of the relatives asking Stan Jones to bring Sheila's blood to Oak Farm for them. Or of the relatives asking Stan Jones to give them crime scene information and photos, although these questions were not answered.

The above means they did not fabricate the silencer which is a big breakthrough.  Which is why David is still pursuing that the relatives got Sheila's blood from a soaking bucket of clothes & created the back splatter effect inside the silencer.

Didn't AE mention the bucket in her WS ? Strange thing to do if she used it's contents to fabricate evidence.

Hello Adam
what a silly notion  blood being taken from a bucket of soaking clothes.  IMO the silencer was not used and I suspect the blood was from a rabbit not Sheila.