Study of the ballistic evidence surrounding the two shots inflicted to Sheila Caffells throat at different conflicting angles, suggests very strongly indeed, that at least one of those two shots had not been fired via use of the anshuzt rifle, despite the fact that the ballistic expert Malcolm Fletcher testified that this rifle had fired both rounds. He was allowed to suggest this, after the original badly fragmented PV/20 bullet had been replaced, in a process of substation, !Ade possible by the undertaking of an 'unreported test fire', of the anshuzt rifle, with control ammunition, on an unspecified date prior to or upon the 12th September 1985. This is provable because (1) - test fired rounds were used in comparison tests at the lab' in the knowledge of the ballistic expert, Fletcher, and DS 'Stan' Jones, on dates preceding the date of the 'Official test fire', of control bullets, on 12th, 13th, 18th and 19th September 1985, yet the official test fire of the rifle using control ammunition, did not take place, until the 20th September, 25th September, 1st and 2nd October 1985, and (2) the ballistic expert would not have any test fired rounds to make comparisons with before the 20th September 1985, but the lab' records clear show that such comparisons had been made on the 12th, 13th, 18th, and 19th September 1985. The fact that these comparison tests had been done on these dates prior to the 20th September 1985, can only mean that somebody fired the anshuzt rifle with new control bullets, at least one week before the date police and their ballistics expert Fletcher stated it had...
