Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all

[lookout]

Well, surely, in order to be orchestrated, they have to fit. That you think they're TOO orchestrated is entirely different.

EP had set the scene for what they thought had happened-----------not what ACTUALLY did happen,as none of them were there as it happened either.

[Caroline]

EP had set the scene for what they thought had happened-----------not what ACTUALLY did happen,as none of them were there as it happened either.

Jeremy set the scene and he WAS THERE!!

[lookout]

Jeremy set the scene and he WAS THERE!!

Any un-contaminated and forensic proof ?

[Caroline]

Any un-contaminated and forensic proof ?

This has been answered more than once! However, apparently to make a claim, you don't need proof 

[lookout]

This has been answered more than once! However, apparently to make a claim, you don't need proof 

But I'm waiting for FORENSIC proof ! Stop evading a perfectly simple question.

[Caroline]

But I'm waiting for FORENSIC proof ! Stop evading a perfectly simple question.

I'm waiting for you to post proof of your claims - stop evading the question.

Forensic proof? The lack of residue on Sheila and the fact that she would have had to hold the rifle at 90 degrees for the lower shot - even with the silencer OFF, it wouldn't be possible. 

[Adam]

Lookout asked me to post what forensic evidence showed Sheila was not the killer. On 'a postage stamp'.

I posted 15 points. But got no response.

[Jan]

Lookout asked me to post what forensic evidence showed Sheila was not the killer. On 'a postage stamp'.

I posted 15 points. But got no response.

probably because you are on ignore.

[guest154]

probably because you are on ignore.

She must have everyone on ignore, because many people have answered her question numerous times.

I'm waiting for you to post proof of your claims - stop evading the question.

Forensic proof? The lack of residue on Sheila and the fact that she would have had to hold the rifle at 90 degrees for the lower shot - even with the silencer OFF, it wouldn't be possible. 

The angle of the weapon for the second shot is a good point, one that I don't think is mentioned enough.

[scipio_usmc]

She must have everyone on ignore, because many people have answered her question numerous times.




The angle of the weapon for the second shot is a good point, one that I don't think is mentioned enough.

The lower shot is the first shot (non-fatal one)

Without the moderator it's unclear whether she would be able to fire the gun at nearly a 90 degree angle at non-contact range.  So far as I can tell no one tested it to see. Since they knew the moderator was attached they simply tested it with the moderator.  Even if possible it is an unlikely to attempt. The natural thing to do is lean into the muzzle which makes it easier to activate the trigger and also to control the weapon.

 

[guest154]

The lower shot is the first shot (non-fatal one)

Without the moderator it's unclear whether she would be able to fire the gun at nearly a 90 degree angle at non-contact range.  So far as I can tell no one tested it to see. Since they knew the moderator was attached they simply tested it with the moderator.  Even if possible it is an unlikely to attempt. The natural thing to do is lean into the muzzle which makes it easier to activate the trigger and also to control the weapon.

 

Ah, thanks, Scip. 


And good point in bold.