The Threat.

[Adam]

Once released Jeremy and his supporters can go into overdrive to discredit the book. Just as they did when Woffinden turned.

That is only if the book is acclaimed. Bad reviews and they will not have to bother so much.

I suppose the best thing to do is prevent publication altogether. Or attempt to get Harrison to change content. Once word has got around of the content, which seems to have happened.

[nugnug]

so with in a few days of him saying alleged on a forum someones found out where he lives and sent him a threatening letter.

and in that time they also found personal details about him.

[guest7363]

His last post was on the 19th September, so it would have been within a fews of that.   

Has his name gone from the members list Patti?

[Caroline]

His last post was on the 19th September, so it would have been within a fews of that.   

he was banned the same day as Jackie suggested he had been sending her PM's, that would have been around 19th. During the exchange of messages, it was quite clear that MD had changed his stance so LOTS of people would have known.

[nugnug]

from his forum posts it wasnt clear at all.

alleged moj doesnt mean. i think hes guilty.

and untill he typed that personally i dident even notice and nobody who wasnt reading the thread would of noticed he gave no indecation that hes stance had changed.

[Caroline]

from his forum posts it wasnt clear at all.

alleged moj doesnt mean. i think hes guilty.

and untill he typed that personally i dident even notice and nobody who wasnt reading the thread would of noticed he gave no indecation that hes stance had changed.

It was no secret that he had changed his stance - perhaps you didn't realise but lots of people did know.

[lookout]

Hang on a minute.Who goes into overdrive if and when there's a hint in Jeremys' favour ?
The world and its wife comes out of the woodwork then as someone tries their level best to put the blockers on anything concerning the word " release ".

[Patti]

Has his name gone from the members list Patti?

Yes it has Justice. 

[nugnug]

It was no secret that he had changed his stance - perhaps you didn't realise but lots of people did know.

well i dont see how they could his posts give no indication of it.

and how else would they know.

[Patti]

he was banned the same day as Jackie suggested he had been sending her PM's, that would have been around 19th. During the exchange of messages, it was quite clear that MD had changed his stance so LOTS of people would have known.

I think you are right Caroline.  It was the 19th. Up to that point I don't think anyone had a clue about his stance though.

From what I gather he had already received threats and had legal issues surrounding his book. So it must be that someone knew before the 19th of September.

A couple of people picked up on it on the 19th that it was suspected that he had changed stance when it made the comment "note I said alleged"  I suppose it all stemmed from that point on?  But after that I doubt anyone was fully aware of it till the news article in the Express.  I don't think his stance had been commented on since the 19th right up to the time and date of this thread.  I could be wrong, but that is how I see it. 

[Caroline]

well i dont see how they could his posts give no indication of it.

and how else would they know.

How do I know how they knew? But they did know. It was mentioned in the thread on 19th, many of the posts were removed but anyone reading it that day - would know. His change of stance had been discussed here before many times both here and on the red forum and I'm surprised you didn't know.

[tyler]

Adam,why would you want to prevent publication. I,for one am looking forward to reading the book. As I understand it the book will go in depth regarding the failings of the Police investigation etc. If the author concludes that Jeremy is indeed guilty then that is his opinion to which he is fully entitled. If the author has conclusive proof that Jeremy is indeed guilty then all the better. Most of us would like the truth either way.

[Caroline]

I think you are right Caroline.  It was the 19th. Up to that point I don't think anyone had a clue about his stance though.

From what I gather he had already received threats and had legal issues surrounding his book. So it must be that someone knew before the 19th of September.

It was talked about by a couple of people on the 19th that it was suspected that he had changed stance when it made the comment "note I said alleged"  I suppose it all stemmed from that point on?

It has been discussed before the 19th, people speculate all of the time. I for one knew he had changed his mind and know that lots of other people also knew. However, NONE OF THEM would have written such a letter. This is turning into a kangaroo court and until it can be made clear who did send it, the accusations should stop.

[lookout]

 So I can still see us being here in 12 months time.

[Caroline]

Adam,why would you want to prevent publication. I,for one am looking forward to reading the book. As I understand it the book will go in depth regarding the failings of the Police investigation etc. If the author concludes that Jeremy is indeed guilty then that is his opinion to which he is fully entitled. If the author has conclusive proof that Jeremy is indeed guilty then all the better. Most of us would like the truth either way.

Excellent post Tyler! Completely agree!!