The Threat.

[nugnug]

im not sure he actully did say that. it could just be the way the paper spun it.

[guest7363]

Well let's hope the book is marketed telling the truth
If you attempt to make money saying you have absolute proof someone is guilty you would be in very serious trouble and no publisher would release a book on such a serious subject based on a theory claiming to be a fact

I suggest that would be the reason the book might NEVER be published

He said this in March Jackie, Before anyone asks, my book is done, its with the publisher and legals now. Still no date for publication, nothing more to say or add at present.                                                                    So it looks like the legal bit is sorted?

[Caroline]

That's rich coming from you

The accuser

Better luck next time Caroline

As long as the letter remains 'hidden' it looks like a stunt

It's even richer coming from you given what you did recently. Had you not already tried to discredit PH, you would never have been under suspicion but when did I accuse you? I'm not playing your childish games Jackie and I hope he does have the letters investigated!!

[ngb1066]

It's even richer coming from you given what you did recently. Had you not already tried to discredit PH, you would never have been under suspicion but when did I accuse you? I'm not playing your childish games Jackie and I hope he does have the letters investigated!!

How many are there?

[Caroline]

How many are there?

One letter and an email.

[nugnug]

Well the only person who can take this whole matter forward is PH himself. The fact that he is not going to that and stated publicly that he does not think the person who penned the letter would be caught.  This alone raises suspicions as to why he might think that given the technology we have today.  He does not think it worthy to make a formal complaint but then goes to the press about it.  It is this that I find odd.

This is no kangaroo court at all Caroline. PH has brought this in the public domain and no matter how you look at this forum....So therefore we are all entitled to make comments.  I do agree that making accusations should not be allowed. The first one to cast those accusation were from those who think Bamber is guilty....and automatically accused a female member on here.  It is not nice to accuse someone of something they have not done, is it? It makes you angry and its upsetting.

Surely we can discuss this in an adult fashion...without the shouting. 

ill give him the benfit of the doubt he could of gone to the press as a warning.

[ngb1066]

One letter and an email.

I must have missed something.  Where is the reference to an email?

[Caroline]

Well the only person who can take this whole matter forward is PH himself. The fact that he is not going to that and stated publicly that he does not think the person who penned the letter would be caught.  This alone raises suspicions as to why he might think that given the technology we have today.  He does not think it worthy to make a formal complaint but then goes to the press about it.  It is this that I find odd.

This is no kangaroo court at all Caroline. PH has brought this in the public domain and no matter how you look at this forum....So therefore we are all entitled to make comments.  I do agree that making accusations should not be allowed. The first one to cast those accusation were from those who think Bamber is guilty....and automatically accused a female member on here.  It is not nice to accuse someone of something they have not done, is it? It makes you angry and its upsetting.

Surely we can discuss this in an adult fashion...without the shouting. 

Had Jackie not already tried to discredit PH with the PM fiasco, she would never have come under suspicion - she brought that on herself. Personally, I have no idea if she did sent it or not. It could be anyone - supporter or non supporter - forum member, ex member ...... so many possibilities but I certainly hope we do find out because it's a pretty sick thing to do!

[Caroline]

I must have missed something.  Where is the reference to an email?

It's nothing to do with the article, he has had threats in the past - you already know that.

[Caroline]

ill give him the benfit of the doubt he could of gone to the press as a warning.

I agree!

[nugnug]

somtimes when your being threatned the only way to stop it is to go public with it.

[ngb1066]

It's nothing to do with the article, he has had threats in the past - you already know that.

I have no recollection of this but obviously I could have forgotten about being told about it.  Can you remind me?  Was he threatened in an email?  If so it should be possible to trace the sender, certainly more easily that in the case of the letter.

[nugnug]

oh yes there much more easy to trace.

[Caroline]

I have no recollection of this but obviously I could have forgotten about being told about it.  Can you remind me?  Was he threatened in an email?  If so it should be possible to trace the sender, certainly more easily that in the case of the letter.

That's for him to discuss but he did tell you that his mail was hacked and that he received threats around that time. I can't believe that writing one bloody book can lead to this  amount of trouble. I hope he has the lot investigated!!

[Caroline]

somtimes when your being threatned the only way to stop it is to go public with it.

When the book was deemed to be innocent linked, he had threats and his mail hacked, now it's the other way, he gets more threats. You can't win!