Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 893654 times)

1 Member and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6615 on: Today at 01:01 PM »
CB was and continues to be treated as a suspect despite the fact there's nothing linking him to MM.

The McCanns were treated as witnesses and suspects.

CAT was treated as a witness based on her own interjection.  CT has never been treated as a witness or a suspect despite:

- his proximity to MM on the Sun and Thu
- the fact he probably learned from PF that the children were being left, night after night, in the unlocked holiday apartment.

I would like to know on what basis these people were not considered witnesses/suspects?

How do we know that Operation Grainge et al, haven't already done some sort of background checks on the Tranmers, and decided they had no need to question them, or have a case to answer for.

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5958
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6616 on: Today at 01:52 PM »
How do we know that Operation Grainge et al, haven't already done some sort of background checks on the Tranmers, and decided they had no need to question them, or have a case to answer for.
Good point, handyman!