The case of Madeleine McCann

[John]

LOL...god no. Amaral was poor cop financially, and had the atire of Columbo. When he wrote his book on MM he changed his image to that of a more dignified character in order to promote his book.

His claims were shocking and without evidence. This is why the book got banned in court of law. I'm not sure if the book was only banned in Portugal and here?? I can't remember...

The book is only banned in the UK although it can still be viewed in English on the www...says it all really.  For the record, the book was based on the Portuguese Attorney General's Archive Report which shelved the original investigation.  One reason for the shelving being the refusal of the tapas group to take part in a reconstruction as required by the investigators.  One has to wonder why in a claimed child abduction case would friends of the parents refuse to cooperate with police? 

One would think the question of cooperation was a foregone conclusion but apparently not in this case.

[Roch]

LOL...god no. Amaral was poor cop financially, and had the atire of Columbo. When he wrote his book on MM he changed his image to that of a more dignified character in order to promote his book.

I can see why he would smarten him self up.  Because the spotlight was put on him, he was thrust in to the media and he was briefed against by the British press.  I think after he was removed and the dust settled, he came out fighting rather than be silenced.  That's the impression I have tended to have of him but I would be willing to review that position if I knew more info about him or about the specific claims he made that were not evidenced.

[Roch]

The book is only banned in the UK although it can still be viewed in English on the www...says it all really.  For the record, the book was based on the Portuguese Attorney General's Archive Report which shelved the original investigation.  One reason for the shelving being the refusal of the tapas group to take part in a reconstruction as required by the investigators.  One has to wonder why in a claimed child abduction case would friends of the parents refuse to cooperate with police? 

One would think the question of cooperation was a foregone conclusion but apparently not in this case.

I will try and find the David Payne video I posted about earlier.

[tyler]

Yes please Roch. I'd be interested in seeing that too.

[Roch]

Yes please Roch. I'd be interested in seeing that too.

Hi Tyler, I believe that the video I saw is somewhere within the vidoes made by this man with a north east accent.  I will continue to try to find it.  In the meantime, here is an overview of the man's opinions...



He also did a video about the 9/11 ball, which is interesting.  I will post that up on the relevant thread.

[Roch]

'The True Story of Madeleine McCann' PART ONE
 

[Roch]

'The True Story of Madeleine McCann' PART TWO



Examines the statements and police interviews of David Payne

[Caroline]

Hi Tyler, I believe that the video I saw is somewhere within the vidoes made by this man with a north east accent.  I will continue to try to find it.  In the meantime, here is an overview of the man's opinions...

<iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"//www.youtube.com/embed/k8SRY_b9HbY\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen></iframe>


He also did a video about the 9/11 ball, which is interesting.  I will post that up on the relevant thread.

This man is more or less saying that he thinks the McCann's killed their own child and that there has been a cover up - why would there be a cover up? What possible reason would ANY police force or government have to cover up the murder or accidental death of a child by her parents? Sorry, I don't get it.

[Roch]

This man is more or less saying that he thinks the McCann's killed their own child and that there has been a cover up - why would there be a cover up? What possible reason would ANY police force or government have to cover up the murder or accidental death of a child by her parents? Sorry, I don't get it.

Hi Caroline,

That is a key question.  Why would there be a cover up?  I've posted up videos 1 & 2 of his research.  There are four videos in total but I'm still watching video 2.  Video 1 is interesting regarding who came on board right from the outset, in representing the McCanns.   

I think Amaral is right when he says of the McCann's "They know that Madeleine is dead and that there were no abductors."

[Roch]

What possible reason would ANY police force or government have to cover up the murder or accidental death of a child by her parents?

To be fair to the Portugese, I'm not sure they could be accused of covering it up.  They could not corroborate the evidence of the sniffer dogs, although there was some DNA evidence.

[Roch]

'The True Story of Madeleine McCann' PART THREE




Examines issues around funding and the use of private detective agencies

[Roch]

'The True Story of Madeleine McCann' PART FOUR




Covers some more of the private investigation shambles.  Also UK govt involvement from the start - Sheree Dodd sent then pulled from her role / leaked letter to Belgian press.  Involvment of Bell Pottinger.  Robert Murat & Gerry McCann mobile phones switched off then back on.

[nugnug]

This man is more or less saying that he thinks the McCann's killed their own child and that there has been a cover up - why would there be a cover up? What possible reason would ANY police force or government have to cover up the murder or accidental death of a child by her parents? Sorry, I don't get it.

the only cover up i can see his him trying cover up his own imcompetence brutality and corruption.

[Patti]

Roch I did reply to you, but sadly all my posts have vanished.  Whoosh! I shall re-write them later..

[Roch]

the only cover up i can see his him trying cover up his own imcompetence brutality and corruption.

Hi Nugsy, Iwould be interested in available info about Amaral.  However I am also conscious of the possibility of him having been smeared.  For example - by 'paid govt trolls'.

With regards to the post by Caroline to which you replied, I understand it is a difficult concept to understand why a government or police force would support parents involved in their own daughter's death abroad.  The end of the Part 4 video briefly discusses some possibilities.  I think it's important to note that the Portugese did not try to cover it up.  But the case became hugely political (for whatever reasons). 

I feel it's also worth noting that govts and police forces (at a certain level) and security services, do not seem to flinch when covering up VIP paedophile activity.  Let's face it - we are talkiing about child sexual abuse.  Children trafficked from care homes to be the play things of the rich and powerful.  Please see the clip of Ken Livingston speaking about this (also at the end of part four).

Some of these childeren have disappeared or committed suicide. 

If you watch the videos, you will be staggered by the level of reaction on the part of the UK Govt. right from the off.