Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891459 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2370 on: October 06, 2014, 10:45:PM »
no they havent said all they have said is her death is not suspicios.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2371 on: October 06, 2014, 10:51:PM »
no they havent said all they have said is her death is not suspicios.

I know this is the wrong thread but I watched the documentary about Daniel. I get so annoyed at our government for allowing a 83 year old get on a train to visit them in London. Why on earth could they not visit Daniel's mum or get someone to fetch her.

Still no further forward with this case Nugs.....I did not know that J.Reese had been to court.

What do you think of Lennons statement at the inquest?  :-\ :) :) :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2372 on: October 06, 2014, 11:03:PM »
im sure what i think about the statement really.

but note was in chardge of invstigation hamish of jill dando fame elm guesthouse fame.

im not suprised they havent cought anybody with him in charge.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2373 on: October 07, 2014, 01:25:PM »
Thanks for replying Patti. Think you misunderstood my main point but it's not something that needs to be debated, I just needed to get it off my chest.  :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2374 on: October 08, 2014, 12:19:AM »
heres sonia poultons take on it. ive nnever really known what to make of her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNJ7aDmcuG4

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2375 on: October 08, 2014, 01:12:AM »
heres sonia poultons take on it. ive nnever really known what to make of her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNJ7aDmcuG4

Very dramatic Nugs. She used the words pursued to her death? No one knows what the poor woman died of yet....

I might get pulled down for this, but why people are so so focused on the parents of Madeline? Why are they not focused on the fact that she is missing?

19 years Jaycee Gudhard's step father was persecuted. 18 months Elizabeth Sharp's father was. When will people stop hounding the innocent and start to rebel to the monsters that took these children?  >:(


Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2376 on: October 08, 2014, 01:14:PM »
I might get pulled down for this, but why people are so so focused on the parents of Madeline? Why are they not focused on the fact that she is missing?

Patti, do you believe the McCann's are innocent parties in Madeleine's disappearance?  I dont mean legally innocent.  I mean actually innocent. 

I get the feeling that a vast number of people feel otherwise. 

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2377 on: October 08, 2014, 04:51:PM »
Patti, do you believe the McCann's are innocent parties in Madeleine's disappearance?  I dont mean legally innocent.  I mean actually innocent. 

I get the feeling that a vast number of people feel otherwise.

I've always believed that they had nothing to do with her disappearance. Why?  :) :) :) :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2378 on: October 08, 2014, 04:56:PM »
i dont think they had anything to do with it.

but they are own worst ememys at times you would think seing as they have people to advise them pr they would come over a lot better.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2379 on: October 08, 2014, 05:29:PM »
 I also say that they had nothing to do with her disappearance.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2380 on: October 08, 2014, 05:44:PM »
i think martin brunts going to be made the scapegoat for this.

http://crimejail.com/martin-brunts-career-mccann-twitter-troll-suicide/

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2381 on: October 08, 2014, 06:00:PM »
 It looks like it,nugs,even though I can't stand the chap.
I hadn't known that the woman had also tweeted the newspapers and some of the famous ?

It'd be like me sending " anonymous mail " to Downing street,the courts,etc about some of the findings on the Bamber forum and other links. Telling them all how little they all know.

Saying that,it would seem that a hate campaign has already been set up to hurl as much mud at Jeremy as is possible,judging by the knock-backs he's had.?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2382 on: October 08, 2014, 06:11:PM »
she also tweeted to martin brunt asking if would investigate some of the things she was saying.

thats how he knew about her i think.

he was also lying when he said the police were investigating her.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2383 on: October 08, 2014, 06:43:PM »
 This is when the internet can be a dangerous area.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2384 on: October 08, 2014, 08:20:PM »
seems like he pretended . to be intrested in her theorys. so he could doorstep and call her a troll on live tv.
« Last Edit: October 09, 2014, 10:41:AM by nugnug »