For Sheila it was very different ..she would have been present at meal times and if needed may also have been able to give her sons drugs as she was their mother.
So not only did Sheila go 'berserk with a gun' as Bamber supposedly told the police his father had said, she had drugged the family first?
So by implication you're saying Sheila planned to 'go berserk' with a gun?
She felt the need to drug two 6 year old lads because she wanted to be sure she could assassinate them in their sleep without them jumping up and overpowering her?
If that is the type of defence Bamber is forwarding no wonder he fails at every turn. I think that is perhaps the least credible scenario I have read on the whole forum!
It is a very credible scenario....some schizophrenic killers do indeed plan beforehand...this would not be unusual ...and in the act of killing may appear berserk to others by their actions.
Nothing odd or unusual at all.....
PB's clear ignorance about how schizophrenic killers can act just undermines his own views.
So good points are made and PB in desperation makes comments that are based on ignorance in order to try sweeping them away. No attempt at reasoned argument ....as it seems PB cannot actually manage that.
Remember PB...IT WAS YOU that seemed to think BOB WOOF WOOF's theory of JB killing in a wet suit was credible......and that theory has been blown out the water as being a pile of tosh by the evidence ..
so that puts your crediblity at rock bottom in my eyes PB.
so TIMMY...? you want a go at me do you......is it personal?....
personally I prefer to discuss the case and points raised rather than see disruptive tactics being used by losers to detract from debate.
As in my post....the police themselves were considering sleeping tablets being used in their investigation so drugging is a valid issue...and as Sheila had the means and the opportunity as well as being a violent type schizophrenic it needs adressing properly.
