Bubo Bubo - Accord to David Birds pocketbook, DB1 (as in David Bird 1) is a soil sample taken from the scene.
I knew that. How come he is recording DB1 on the 10/09/85 but he recorded DB2 - DB6 on the day 07/08/85? There are only two explanations. 1 The DB who sampled the SM, fire debris etc. is someone else with the initials DB or 2 he has had to create a DB1 by adding an entry to the end of a log book page. The entry would be valid without the last line. The soil sample was to check for a match with soil found on the bike tyres I believe.
By the time he made the entry Ainsley was in charge and working with AE and PE on the silencer ploy they needed to to replace the original entry which would be used to replace the one they were going to change to DRB1. They may have chosen David Bird because his initials fitted and this allowed them to keep another operative with initials DB secret. Of course it could just be a clumsy bit of evidence manipulation.
If as I suggest they were in the business of a cover up there may have been assets used who they wished to remain anonymous.
Of course Mr X could have been told to register his finds as DB.
hmm the photographer visits the farm on the 10th of september but it seems only takes photographs that do not include in interior photos of WHF.
The so called finding of a silencer in august claims should have prompted photographs being taken shortly afterwards ..including the so called scratches on the aga surround.
The real case seems to be that the silencer supposedly found in the gun cupboard in september and handed in on the 11th prompted a rapid response to take photographs of the aga surround underside and the gun cupboard on the 12th.
As I see it the photographs being taken as they were on these issues supports the view that no silencer was found by the relatives in august and handed in shortly afterwards but does support a silencer being handed in to the police on the 11th september.
just a theory....
the police photographer visits whf on 10th september...but ONLY takes photographs of things outside the house ...to infer no entry was made by the police into whf on that day...
but how about a police officer enters and plants the silencer after scratching paint with it and leaves it in the gun cupboard for "the relatives" to find....which happens the very next day...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm the blue socks.... from the main bedroom...
for a suicide investigation...they seem unimportant and can be passed off as possibly neville's..for people are not looking at things too closely as no one is going to be charged are they ?...so without a defence poking its nose it...there is less need to be so picky over fine details that might not tie up with a suicide theory.
the story changes when its murder so little details that dont add up may play a far bigger role...hence the socks are now important ..due to claims about sheila's alleged clean feet which they should not be if she was murdered and had walked over a carpet that had wet blood spots all over it around the time it is alleged she was murdered.
