Remember, what 'DS JONES' told the 'COLP' Investigation (1991) that on the evening of the '9th August 1985' when both 'he' and 'DCI JONES' went to speak to 'Jeremy' at his cottage [9 Head Street, Goldhanger], and please pay attention to what 'DS JONES' told the 'COLP' investigators...
'DURING THE QUESTIONING', 'DCI JONES' discussed the 'SILENCER' adding, 'I THINK I WAS AWARE OF THE SILENCER' having been discussed 'PREVIOUSLY'...
Remember, what 'DS JONES' told the 'COLP' Investigation (1991) that on the evening of the '9th August 1985' when both 'he' and 'DCI JONES' went to speak to 'Jeremy' at his cottage [9 Head Street, Goldhanger], and please pay attention to what 'DS JONES' told the 'COLP' investigators...
'DURING THE QUESTIONING', 'DCI JONES' discussed the 'SILENCER' adding, 'I THINK I WAS AWARE OF THE SILENCER' having been discussed 'PREVIOUSLY'...
7th August 1985
'DS JONES' returns to crime scene and collects 4 pieces of evidence [exhibits 'SBJ/1', 'SBJ/2', 'SBJ/3', and 'SBJ/4']. Exhibit 'SBJ/1'[item 22] belonging to 'Pargeter (. 22 BRNO bolt-action rifle 'silencer') which was purchased by 'Anthony Pargeter' in '1980', which had 17 internalised metal baffle plates [ this later became exhibit 'DRB/1' when it was sent to the lab' on the '20th September 1985', to which experts at the lab' allocated blood group evidence to it, which was associated to a 2nd silencer ['DB/1'] 'item 23', which 'David Boutflour' claimed to have found inside a cupboard in a downstairs office of the farmhouse, on the '10th August 1985'...
Police logs compiled by uniform officers at the crime scene [7th August 1985], confirm that 'DS JONES' did return to the 'FARM' after having earlier left the scene, in the company of 'DC Clark' to go with 'Jeremy Bamber' back to his cottage [`9 HEAD STREET'] in Order to obtain ' a first witness Statement' (7th August 1985)! from' him'. 'YET' when 'JONES' was questioned by 'COLP' (in 1991)regarding this matter, 'DS JONES' denied having any recollection of returning to the scene after he had left white House Farm with 'DC CLARK' and 'Jeremy Bamber'...
'DAMNING POLICE LOGS'..
(7th August 1985)
'DC CLARK , - I am at 9 Head Street, Goldhanger ( home address of 'Jeremy Bamber') taking a statement. Please ask 'DS JONES' at the scene to phone me Goldhanger 88645 - 12.20pm
i/r - - message above passed - 12.22pm
(http://IMG_20220322_083504.jpg)
(http://IMG_20220322_083547)
The Scarlet Pimpernel SBJ AKA Stanley Brian Jones.
With respect to Baroness Orczy and QC who found my posts interesting.
We seek him here, we seek him there, Those Frenchies seek him everywhere. Is he in heaven?—Is he in hell?
That dammed, elusive Pimpernel. AKA Stanley Brian Jones
Stan Jones was involved in the police informatives. His role was to take photos that ‘Taff’ did not want mixed with the crime scene photos. In addition he had to be ‘Taffs’ eyes and ears while he left WHF to attend a previously arranged meeting.
At least DB was a SOCO (photography and fingerprinting), SJ was just a Detective Sergeant. (Ds). He did not arrive at the scene with Clark. He arrived with Davidson Henderson and Miller at 09.16. Clark arrived with ‘Taff’ at 09.14.
He did not go with JB and Clark to 9 Head Street as is made clear in the Dickinson Enquiry Report. Paragraph 214. It does not say at what time he went to JB’s. This paragraph raises further questions because the trip by Clark and JB is timed at 10.10.
In her 08/09/85 statement AE says she tried to reach JB but did not make contact until 08.40. (sheet 20) How can this be if JB was still at WHF?
She also makes reference to JB checking with his policeman whether it would be OK for her to visit. Note policeman not policemen. She says she arrived at 09. 10 and hugged JB (sheet 20) and that SJ was present (sheet 21).
If these timings are right and the Dickinson report wrong, then there is no way Clarke could have entered the premises with SJ because even the SOCO team had to wait till 10.00
SJ did not return to WHF from Head street. The entry is an error by Chaplin. I believe this is ‘Taff’ returning and she has put Ds instead of Det Sup. He had left the scene early for a pre-arranged meeting and returned. She made the same mistake earlier for ‘Taffs’ entry to the property at 09.33 along with other senior officers.
She also made another recording error. At 10.40 she records a special vehicle CT? arriving for informatives and then leaving at 10.59 with SJ as well as others leaving at this time. I believe it should read remained on informatives for SJ and CT not left on informatives. Why would they leave the scene having just arrived if the informatives were taking place inside WHF
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=11177.0;attach=58686;image
There is further evidence that SJ did not return to WHF from Head street. Why when asking for SJ to contact him at JB’s does Clark tell him where he is and what he is doing. If he had been to Head street, he would know where Clark was and what his allocated task was. He would surely have just asked for him to get in touch at 12.20 and the contact number.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=11177.0;attach=58676
Apart from the perhaps obvious errors by Chaplin this looks like a concerted effort to disguise and hide the tasks performed by SJ on the morning of 07/08/85.
They had no choice but to use SBJ in the SM deception. Only someone who knew exactly what had happened could be persuaded to create the false find by the family on 10/08/85 and produce the appropriate paperwork such as statements and manipulated pocket books.
What other Policeman of any rank could have fulfilled this role? He was used in this role to draw attention away from DB’s find of the SM on the 07/08/85 and place the find as being made by the family.