Books on the Case

[Aunt Agatha]

I have all Jeremy’s letters from approx 1991 - 2013.
These letters describe in his own words the lead up to the case and what he believed happened during this tragic event. We now know that his understanding of the event, as it was originally depicted by the police in Court, was floored and the real happenings of that night were covered up.

I must state, that in his letters to me, especially the ones from the early days, still remain true.
What I mean is, no evidence to date has been found to incriminate Jeremy or his statements in them.

I am still of the view Jeremy was framed - Jeremy is innocent.

I suppose I have the beginnings of a autobiography here, written in his own words. That should be put into a drama along with the true facts discovered by many members over the years.  Once guilt or innocence could be exposed if done in the right way.

What do you think?

Along with mikes letters, from his early correspondence, using Jeremy’s own words again, I think we might have something.

[David1819]

I think you should read some of the books on the case in order to consider a different perspective.

I don't think she is interested in a fictional perspective.

[Steve_uk]

I don't think she is interested in a fictional perspective.

He must be if he's already read Jeremy's letters.

[Jon2]

Along with mikes letters, from his early correspondence, using Jeremy’s own words again, I think we might have something.

Would be a very interesting read.

[Aunt Agatha]

I think you should read some of the books on the case in order to consider a different perspective.

I did Steve, I proof read Roger Wilkes book for Jeremy before it went to print.  I recall very well the conversations Roger and Jeremy had.

[Aunt Agatha]

Along with mikes letters, from his early correspondence, using Jeremy’s own words again, I think we might have something.

It could expose the facts as to whether or not Jeremy was consistent with the facts for one thing.
Before the internet, or mobile phones and very little interest in Jeremy’s case, a couple of us had only Jeremy’s statement of events during and not long after the shootings.

Did he say the same thing to us all then and has his written words changed in any way.  The facts of that night, viewed by Jeremy, should all be the same thence as they are today.  Especially with all his new friends
And the amount of exposure his case has had over the years.

The armchair detectives in this group would definitely draw out any inconsistenciesx

[Steve_uk]

It could expose the facts as to whether or not Jeremy was consistent with the facts for one thing.
Before the internet, or mobile phones and very little interest in Jeremy’s case, a couple of us had only Jeremy’s statement of events during and not long after the shootings.

Did he say the same thing to us all then and has his written words changed in any way.  The facts of that night, viewed by Jeremy, should all be the same thence as they are today.  Especially with all his new friends
And the amount of exposure his case has had over the years.

The armchair detectives in this group would definitely draw out any inconsistenciesx

The problem with all this is that you make it sound as if there are volumes of information which Jeremy has volunteered. Apart from the first morning at Goldhanger (7 August 1985) where he blubbered his way through events of hours past there's been nothing at all of relevance to his innocence emanating from his mouth. His attitude to Police interrogation was a case in point.

[Aunt Agatha]

The problem with all this is that you make it sound as if there are volumes of information which Jeremy has volunteered. Apart from the first morning at Goldhanger (7 August 1985) where he blubbered his way through events of hours past there's been nothing at all of relevance to his innocence emanating from his mouth. His attitude to Police interrogation was a case in point.

I would seriously beg to differ!

There is not volumes of information, you are correct.  However, what information there is in these letters depends upon the reader and what they are looking for.

[Steve_uk]

I would seriously beg to differ!

There is not volumes of information, you are correct.  However, what information there is in these letters depends upon the reader and what they are looking for.

..and whenever you feel you're getting close there will be some diversionary tactic. It's why he has run through so many legal representatives over the years.

[JackieD]

I would seriously beg to differ!

There is not volumes of information, you are correct.  However, what information there is in these letters depends upon the reader and what they are looking for.

You wouldn’t have Jeremy onside though would you

[Aunt Agatha]

You wouldn’t have Jeremy onside though would you

I don’t understand your point. Please elaborate.

[JackieD]

I don’t understand your point. Please elaborate.

You wouldn’t have Jeremy’s permission to go ahead or do you plan to go ahead anyway

[guest154]

I have all Jeremy’s letters from approx 1991 - 2013.
These letters describe in his own words the lead up to the case and what he believed happened during this tragic event. We now know that his understanding of the event, as it was originally depicted by the police in Court, was floored and the real happenings of that night were covered up.

I must state, that in his letters to me, especially the ones from the early days, still remain true.
What I mean is, no evidence to date has been found to incriminate Jeremy or his statements in them.

I am still of the view Jeremy was framed - Jeremy is innocent.

I suppose I have the beginnings of a autobiography here, written in his own words. That should be put into a drama along with the true facts discovered by many members over the years.  Once guilt or innocence could be exposed if done in the right way.

What do you think?

I still think you're too nice to be anywhere near, Bamber. 

[Aunt Agatha]

You wouldn’t have Jeremy’s permission to go ahead or do you plan to go ahead anyway

Why would I need Jeremy’s permission?

The letters belong to me.

[Aunt Agatha]

I still think you're too nice to be anywhere near, Bamber. 

So good to see you on here Mat.  X