Video re photographs non-disclosure

[susan]

Hello RJ

maybe you can tell the forum why you have totally ignored me for well over a year when we were best friends the only reason I can think of was I disagreed strongly with a post of yours.  You referred to dirt has flown in when I came back a couple of days ago wonder what you meant by that but I see the post has now been changed.  I was very hurt by your behaviour to me and I did apologise if I offended you.  In her defence Jackie has never ignored or been nasty to me. 

[JackieD]

Ive been here since 2010, when it started joining early 2011 I think, anyway that has nothing to do with it, I’m not getting into your very sick and sad arguments, it’s the new me, RJ Reformed 😇😇

So be falsely accused (like Jeremy) of something horrendous is sick and sad

There you go

[JackieD]

Hello RJ

maybe you can tell the forum why you have totally ignored me for well over a year when we were best friends the only reason I can think of was I disagreed strongly with a post of yours.  You referred to dirt has flown in when I came back a couple of days ago wonder what you meant by that but I see the post has now been changed.  I was very hurt by your behaviour to me and I did apologise if I offended you.  In her defence Jackie has never ignored or been nasty to me.

So you referred to Susan as the dirt has flown back in ??

You can’t really take that back can you

What did she ever do to deserve that

[susan]

Jackie he did not name me but it was when I came back he must have realised he was out of order so he changed the post I did not deserve that and he made me feel I should not have come back and I wish I had stayed away Reference was made to Parrots I was agreeing with Kaldin as I could not remember what had happened terrible

[Adam]

The only major thing aledged non disclosed documents may show, is proof of the industrial frame. But surely these documents would have been destroyed.

One document may question one piece of evidence. That would not prove innocence as there is so much other circumstantial and forensic evidence. However it may mean Bamber can go for a technicality.

It is a good idea to claim non disclosure as it may get sympathy from the general public.

[JackieD]

Jackie he did not name me but it was when I came back he must have realised he was out of order so he changed the post I did not deserve that and he made me feel I should not have come back and I wish I had stayed away Reference was made to Parrots I was agreeing with Kaldin as I could not remember what had happened terrible

A leopard never changes his spots

I wonder what an earth you could have done to provoke horrendous  attack???

[sami]

Jackie he did not name me but it was when I came back he must have realised he was out of order so he changed the post I did not deserve that and he made me feel I should not have come back and I wish I had stayed away Reference was made to Parrots I was agreeing with Kaldin as I could not remember what had happened terrible

SUSAN youve got it wrong,it wasnt meant for you i can assure of that %100 because rj messaged me to say who that post was aimed at,and i totally agreed with him

[sami]

So you referred to Susan as the dirt has flown back in ??

You can’t really take that back can you

What did she ever do to deserve that

stop shit stirring,youve done worse on several occasions

[JackieD]

stop shit stirring,youve done worse on several occasions

I am agreeing with Susan it’s  unacceptable behaviour

Since when did you start worrying about my ‘blood pressure’ Sami’

[Jane]

Don’t worry I have sent him the same. So he has your full support for me being falsely accused of something by him and him not acknowledging he was completely wrong and being completely fooled by a troll.

He obviously thinks that was ok

What it’s like to be in Jeremy’s shoes, I know exactly
So for the record are you saying Neil didn’t accuse me?
Are you saying Mat isn’t a troll?
Are you saying it wasn’t any of your friends who set up a false account to get me banned because of all the influential people I got involved in the case?
Are you saying I shouldn’t have had an apology?

Please spell it out to me ?

Going by your track record, Jackie, I doubt ANYONE has accused you of anything you either haven't done, OR you're not behind, so there would be absolutely neither need nor necessity for apology.

May we take from you being cognisant of being in Jeremy's shoes that you were adopted or have spent time in prison?

I would, from what I know of Neil, believe it to be highly -indeed HUGELY- unlikely that he'd accuse anyone without full and certain knowledge that he was right to so do.

I have never, personally, experienced Mat as being a Troll. I'd remind you that it's been about 3 years since Mat posted here. You are rather raking the barrel to find somewhere to allocate blame.

I know NOTHING about any false accounts but I'll freely admit to requesting a life time ban for you. I didn't need to resort to the underhand to so do. Neither, to my knowledge, did anyone I choose to call friend.

I AM saying, that of all the members here, until such time as you admit, openly, to the mischief you've caused and the lies you've told, the unwarranted insults you've handed out, the threats you've made, the dirt you've dug, you're the very LAST person on this forum deserving of apology.

It's very possible to believe that, because of another agenda, over the time he accepted your support, you may have done more harm than good to Jeremy's cause. It's possible that Neil may feel more charitable to you, than do I. The above is no more than a litany of "poor me". It's time you took some responsibility for your own actions.

Please take note that in this post I've said nothing rude to, or about you.

[Caroline]

With regard to the comment above it’s entirely up to you who you respect but previously your judgement seems to have let you down very badly especially over Mat the troll. I have NEVER had a public apology from you regarding being accused of giving out your personal details on clearly a fake account which you eventually and only recently accepted in a pm. Why have you never apologised personally or openly on an open forum after letting forum members believe I had done something so nasty.

It’s obvious I am not highly regarded as a forum member by yourself yet I am regarded highly enough by people trying to keep Jeremy in prison to make up false accounts to try to get me banned.
Who else suffers that kind of behaviour?

I can’t even get my head around it and yet you let Jane and Caroline’s friend continue to post on the forum.

I guess we both have a different level of how we choose to respect people. You obviously don’t think Caroline and Jane are rude to innocent posters like Kaldin and Jan in the hope they will leave the forum. You obviously don’t think people gang up on me on the forum. Are you blind.

You respect these people

Nobody knows for sure if Jeremy is innocent or guilty and I am only interested in the facts.

Caroline can post a million times on the forum about the phone calls and it’s a complete waste of time as there is NO proof either way.

Mugfords statements can be ignored as there is not a person alive who can pull of lying and deception better than her

At least you have made it clear what type of posters you are looking to encourage on the forum

Let’s see how quickly this post gets removed

YOU are the rudest person on the forum - stop crying Jackie. You're problem is that you're far too emotional, you hate people you don't even know. That's very sad. I don 't think your post should be removed because it shows how quickly you can turn on someone - someone who has done his very best to support you in the past and at times when it must have been VERY difficult (if not almost impossible) for him to do so. All you have to do is post about the case and quit the hate - you'll be a lot happier and the forum will lose the atmosphere.

NGB certainly has my support and I agree with everything he said in his previous post. RJ is a decent human being and deserves respect - most likely, this is why you don't like him. Your loss!

[JackieD]

YOU are the rudest person on the forum - stop crying Jackie. You're problem is that you're far too emotional, you hate people you don't even know. That's very sad. I don 't think your post should be removed because it shows how quickly you can turn on someone - someone who has done his very best to support you in the past and at times when it must have been VERY difficult (if not almost impossible) for him to do so. All you have to do is post about the case and quit the hate - you'll be a lot happier and the forum will lose the atmosphere.

NGB certainly has my support and I agree with everything he said in his previous post. RJ is a decent human being and deserves respect - most likely, this is why you don't like him. Your loss!

That’s exactly why I expose people like you.

Ngb has your support for falsely accusing me of something I never did and would never do. I don’t know if his post was a wind up about respecting you but you are without a doubt with your post littered with explanation marks and your constant bullying of Lookout and your constant bullying by your gang.  It’s not normal behaviour.
When you supported Jeremy you never did a thing to move the case forward but you are a good addition to the guilty side because you continually get shown up by people that outwit you

You carry on supporting people who falsely accuse people of things they haven’t done. Nothing changes

[Caroline]

That’s exactly why I expose people like you.

Ngb has your support for falsely accusing me of something I never did and would never do. I don’t know if his post was a wind up about respecting you but you are without a doubt with your post littered with explanation marks and your constant bullying of Lookout and your constant bullying by your gang.  It’s not normal behaviour.
When you supported Jeremy you never did a thing to move the case forward but you are a good addition to the guilty side because you continually get shown up by people that outwit you

You carry on supporting people who falsely accuse people of things they haven’t done. Nothing changes

I am not bothered what you say you did or didn't do. You're like the boy who cried wolf. You're a silly woman who needs to grow up - talking about gangs? You just can't see how stupid that is. I might get heated with Lookout now and again - but actually, I like her and I am sure she enjoys some of the more heated debates. I can use exclamation marks as much as I like - why should that bother you. And NO! NGB wasn't winding anyone up.. Your problem is, you assume too much - I have a VERY GOOD relationship with NGB!

I have absolutely no interest in your opinion of me - you're an embarrassment. You haven't moved the case forward either and your hideous attitude would put people off supporting Bamber anyway. Look at you now - off on a rant because support was show to another poster who you don't like. Spiteful and pathetic!

I would never support you Jackie - you spit too much venom!

[sami]

That’s exactly why I expose people like you.

Ngb has your support for falsely accusing me of something I never did and would never do. I don’t know if his post was a wind up about respecting you but you are without a doubt with your post littered with explanation marks and your constant bullying of Lookout and your constant bullying by your gang.  It’s not normal behaviour.
When you supported Jeremy you never did a thing to move the case forward but you are a good addition to the guilty side because you continually get shown up by people that outwit you

You carry on supporting people who falsely accuse people of things they haven’t done. Nothing changes

you are clearly related to jb,hence your hatred for forum members who think him guilty,you support jb now,how have you moved the case forward,.nothing that is posted on here will affect jb,s whole life sentence,why not debate the topics instead of slagging off forum members,its very childess of you.the gang thing is in your head only iam not in any gang

[susan]

Hello sami thank you for your reply and your explanation that Real Justice was not referring to me as DIRT but another poster on the forum not a nice thing to say whoever the post was aimed at.  I have noticed that the post has now been modified.  Sami whilst I believe you cos I know what a nice guy you are and we get on so well but other posters on the forum may not so in fairness to Real Justice maybe you should get him to message NGB who this post was aimed at then NGB will confirm on the forum it was not me he was calling dirt.  Matter will be then closed and I will offer my sincere apologies to RJ on the open forum How do you feel about that my friend x