The other side to the argument is already known . Everyone says he must be guilty because he did not call 999 and rush to the farm . It is implicated it shows his guilt. So why would I repeat that ?
And I am perfectly entitled to look at it from the other angle . And I am saying that assuming he IS guilty why did he get the call so wrong or if it was planned that way then why ?
I have also said I am leaning towards innocent I have never ever hidden that . But still asking questions.
No Jan, posters don’t think he’s guilty because of the 999 call, if it was based on that and that alone he wouldn’t have been convicted, it just looks suspicious from a guilty standpoint that’s all. Bamber's actions and Bamber's reasons we will never know, like Maggie said everything can cancel each argument out, but on a item like this you can only think how you would react given the same scenarios.
I can honestly say, if my Father rang and asked me to get over, I would without hesitation dash straight there, I wouldn’t ring my girlfriend and get her out bed, what advice could she give me, I wouldn’t ring police because if my Dad thought it series he would have, so why do I need to ring police, he’s not asked me to ring police.