Author Topic: Video re photographs non-disclosure  (Read 94593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #690 on: January 01, 2020, 06:29:PM »
I just read. The statements I don’t think it was referring to the accusation it was self induced .

Just read Jones's testimony - no one actually saw him being sick "he appeared to be being sick, he put he body forwards as if he was trying to be sick' - he was 100 yards away with his back toward Jones and Craig.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #691 on: January 01, 2020, 06:31:PM »
theres no evidence to say he vomited either


He appeared to be vomiting according to police statements .

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #692 on: January 01, 2020, 06:32:PM »

He appeared to be vomiting according to police statements .

'Appeared' - no one saw him actually being sick.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #693 on: January 01, 2020, 06:33:PM »
Does it matter?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #694 on: January 01, 2020, 06:33:PM »
Just read Jones's testimony - no one actually saw him being sick "he appeared to be being sick, he put he body forwards as if he was trying to be sick' - he was 100 yards away with his back toward Jones and Craig.


Oh another of his plans to deceive then that backfired because he was not close enough .


Should have tried harder.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #695 on: January 01, 2020, 06:34:PM »
'Appeared' - no one saw him actually being sick.
thanks caroline,i was just about to post the same

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #696 on: January 01, 2020, 06:34:PM »

Oh another of his plans to deceive then that backfired because he was not close enough .


Should have tried harder.

He wasn't close enough for a reason. Why walk 100 yards away?  :-\ If you need to be sick, you need to be sick.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #697 on: January 01, 2020, 06:35:PM »
Does it matter?

Not really . Just a general case of some people are excused because they are in shock and when others show the same signs they are immediately faking it . Par for the course really .

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #698 on: January 01, 2020, 06:36:PM »

Oh another of his plans to deceive then that backfired because he was not close enough .


Should have tried harder.
i agree should have tried harder,theres a few things he wishes he should have done and should not have done.hindsight is a wonderful thing

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #699 on: January 01, 2020, 06:36:PM »
Not really . Just a general case of some people are excused because they are in shock and when others show the same signs they are immediately faking it . Par for the course really .

Oh I see. I don't think it's relevant. Perhaps he felt sick, perhaps he felt a bit faint, perhaps he was pretending. Nobody knows.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #700 on: January 01, 2020, 06:37:PM »

Oh another of his plans to deceive then that backfired because he was not close enough .


Should have tried harder.


Who, given the circumstances, would have suspected fakery?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #701 on: January 01, 2020, 06:40:PM »
SJ had also said that JB was " heard laughing " but in actual fact it could well have been a choked/stifled sob as it was heard outside the room and not inside where it would have been visible.

Of course it can be turned into a laugh if it suited the agenda at the time.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #702 on: January 01, 2020, 07:11:PM »

Who, given the circumstances, would have suspected fakery?


Well apparently now it’s all crystal clear that everything he did was contrived ridiculous and fake and has no logic whatsoever . he led the police operation and was within a few days the greatest actor ever and next the worst . As it’s all so obvious I am shocked those experienced police men did not spot it immediately .

And still no answer why as a guilty man he did not just wait and call 999 . Rather than looking like an idiot .

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #703 on: January 01, 2020, 07:15:PM »
I wonder how straight-forward it would have been had he rang 999.? That would have been taken as " part of his plan ", surely ? He was damned if he did and damned if he didn't really.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #704 on: January 01, 2020, 07:18:PM »
SJ had also said that JB was " heard laughing " but in actual fact it could well have been a choked/stifled sob as it was heard outside the room and not inside where it would have been visible.

Of course it can be turned into a laugh if it suited the agenda at the time.
good point lookout ,he may have got that wrong especially if had been on the bottle