Author Topic: Video re photographs non-disclosure  (Read 94592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #600 on: December 29, 2019, 03:12:PM »
They never want to debate truth Caroline, they follow a Parrot script unfortunately, talking of Parrots there’s some dirt just flew in 😂😂😂

Projection time is it RJ?  8)

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #601 on: December 29, 2019, 03:13:PM »
Kaldin I know the feeling  :)) :)) :)) :))

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #602 on: December 29, 2019, 03:15:PM »
Projection time is it RJ?  8)
Yes 😂😂😂. Forgot you were an expert

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #603 on: December 29, 2019, 03:38:PM »
There are plenty of threads to post unrelated 'stuff' - I guess the innocent side aren't keen on the fact that PC Bird wasn't an expert because it has implications for the negatives and put the mockers on a conspiracy. It's OK though - I'll just keep reposting CAL's response - just so you don't forget  ;)





I find that sad really as all it does is give the impression that you have nothing else to say or discuss except to expect some sort of inflammatory response from a bit of information to which I'm personally not interested in as the person in question has to start somewhere doesn't he ? So what's the big deal about an " apprentice " being incompetent when you have so-called trained for years police officers who can't even do their job properly ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #604 on: December 29, 2019, 03:54:PM »




I find that sad really as all it does is give the impression that you have nothing else to say or discuss except to expect some sort of inflammatory response from a bit of information to which I'm personally not interested in as the person in question has to start somewhere doesn't he ? So what's the big deal about an " apprentice " being incompetent when you have so-called trained for years police officers who can't even do their job properly ?


Or to put it another way, it's perfectly correct for Lookout et al to shout loudly about the incompetency of  long-trained EP generally, but a definite No No for detractors to to make the same observations of an only just trained police photographer?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #605 on: December 29, 2019, 04:05:PM »

Or to put it another way, it's perfectly correct for Lookout et al to shout loudly about the incompetency of  long-trained EP generally, but a definite No No for detractors to to make the same observations of an only just trained police photographer?




And why not ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #606 on: December 29, 2019, 04:12:PM »



And why not ?


Going by your answer, it does rather sound as if you're prepared to use the dirty tactics you accuse others of using.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #607 on: December 29, 2019, 04:15:PM »

Going by your answer, it does rather sound as if you're prepared to use the dirty tactics you accuse others of using.




Maybe that's your " dirty " mind ??

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #608 on: December 29, 2019, 04:23:PM »



Maybe that's your " dirty " mind ??



How's that, Lookout. You've agreed that it's fair game for you to apply tactics that it's not okay for detractors to use.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #609 on: December 29, 2019, 04:28:PM »


How's that, Lookout. You've agreed that it's fair game for you to apply tactics that it's not okay for detractors to use.




It's not me who uses tactics.Why would I ? My mind was made up years ago---yours wasn't !!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #610 on: December 29, 2019, 04:43:PM »



It's not me who uses tactics.Why would I ? My mind was made up years ago---yours wasn't !!


So I can see why tactics might be necessary for you to hold on to that belief. To hold any belief for years without questioning it seems rather like having faith. It certainly doesn't require any deep thinking, just acceptance......................and you have the temerity to call us "sheep"?!!!!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #611 on: December 29, 2019, 04:52:PM »

So I can see why tactics might be necessary for you to hold on to that belief. To hold any belief for years without questioning it seems rather like having faith. It certainly doesn't require any deep thinking, just acceptance......................and you have the temerity to call us "sheep"?!!!!




I didn't need a band of people to make my mind up. I did it all by myself with how I'd worked things out.
I don't necessarily follow anyone, I'm my own person.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #612 on: December 29, 2019, 05:39:PM »



I didn't need a band of people to make my mind up. I did it all by myself with how I'd worked things out.
I don't necessarily follow anyone, I'm my own person.
what is the best piece of evidence that makes you feel jb is innocent

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #613 on: December 29, 2019, 05:45:PM »
what is the best piece of evidence that makes you feel jb is innocent





The best piece of evidence is that there isn't any.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #614 on: December 29, 2019, 05:58:PM »
   You're welcome, Jackie. I think there is more to come yet.

There is indeed. I have now received a reply from CAL in respect to PC Bird and his experience as a scenes of crime photographer. The Bamber case was indeed only the second major incident he had attended after having taken the Scenes of Crime course when he joined Chelmsford. I have sent the proof of contact to NGB but have copied her response below,

"Dave Bird; he joined the police in 1976 (Canvey Island) but it wasn’t until he joined the Chelmsford lot that he decided to specialise in crime scene photography and took the required course. Bamber was his second major assignment in that capacity".
Few people have the imagination for reality