Author Topic: Video re photographs non-disclosure  (Read 94599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #495 on: August 17, 2018, 07:53:PM »
Can you name these people ?

His old school master for one!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #496 on: August 17, 2018, 08:08:PM »
Can you name these people ?

Yes Caroline why don’t you name them all ????
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #497 on: August 17, 2018, 08:09:PM »
His old school master for one!

For one ????
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #498 on: August 17, 2018, 08:10:PM »
His old school master for one!


How funny because his old friend at Gresham Matt Baker said he finds it impossible to believe Jeremy was capable of the murders
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #499 on: August 17, 2018, 08:15:PM »
Yes Caroline why don’t you name them all ????

How many of his old friends stood by him?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #500 on: August 17, 2018, 10:56:PM »
How many of his old friends stood by him?



Well you don’t know that do you?
That is a fact isn’t it
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #501 on: August 17, 2018, 11:35:PM »


Well you don’t know that do you?
That is a fact isn’t it

Neither do YOU! But I would say NONE!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #502 on: August 17, 2018, 11:41:PM »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #503 on: August 20, 2018, 06:28:PM »
SJ hated his guts but it's still no reason for having him convicted of murder.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #504 on: August 20, 2018, 06:35:PM »
" It is better to risk saving a guilty person than to condemn an innocent one " Voltaire.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #505 on: August 20, 2018, 07:36:PM »
SJ hated his guts but it's still no reason for having him convicted of murder.

No he didn't  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #506 on: August 20, 2018, 07:49:PM »
No he didn't  ::)







Oh he did----he must have done for it to spur him on with his so-called " investigation ". He had to finish what he'd started to justify his gut feeling.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #507 on: August 20, 2018, 07:53:PM »






Oh he did----he must have done for it to spur him on with his so-called " investigation ". He had to finish what he'd started to justify his gut feeling.

Perhaps you're simply reflecting what your own gut feeling leads you to do?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #508 on: August 20, 2018, 07:57:PM »
Perhaps you're simply reflecting what your own gut feeling leads you to do?







I'm not in the habit of jailing people though.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #509 on: August 20, 2018, 09:21:PM »
Well, we've only your word on that. Your soul may tell another story.






My soul tells me the same if you must know. Middle-aged and elderly have no place in prison.