" Just another job " in righting all the wrongs from a previous trial will probably be the biggest job they will ever encounter. They're going over myriads of documents that constituted one of the biggest murder trials of its day and to me that's some feat. Doesn't it beg the question as to why it was necessary in bothering doing this ? What it tells me is that there had to be something radically wrong in the first place to even consider going over someone else's work ? Not that half those involved will be bothered since they're deceased but there are one or two who are still breathing and one who contacts the CT team. I do hold the legal team in high regard as they're trained and clever people so why wouldn't I ? I respect anyone with brains.
Since we've discussed the bathroom and office, we haven't seen these areas to get any further ideas since both places have been regularly mentioned. Also the room where the toy gun was found. I've got no desire to see furnishings/décor etc just the layout of the place in picture form to get more of an idea of things that were mentioned as a full picture would have been more interesting.
Did we ever see a pic of the broken light/lamp ?
As for Sheila's records and because she's no longer alive EP should be obliged to hand them over. With Jeremy it's different because he's living. I doubt his contain anything more than a UTI or similar which he obviously wouldn't want broadcast and by this I'm going by what JM had said in her " January " page of her diary.
It wouldn't be in the interest of EP to have burned anything incriminating because they must have known for a long time that the case has been on-going and that past solicitors/lawyers have certain material which matches up along with the realisation that there are " gaps " in some of the work. These " gaps " are what's missing which EP will have known that the legals were aware of and if anything was destroyed it would highlight the guilt of EP. ( difficult to explain but I know what I mean )
"Righting all the wrongs" does rather smack of the mass conspiracy that Adam is so fond of mentioning. It's also one of the main reasons that the whole "Jeremy is innocent" claim has become unbelievable. It's grown both legs AND wings. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that, many of the suggestions put forward as fact, almost makes your gut feeling sound reasoned!!!
The legal team are unlikely to be doing more than previous legal teams have done in this, and other cases. Whilst it maybe laborious work, it won't require brainpower above and beyond what they're trained for. When it comes to "something being radically wrong", this will be their client's view. They take instructions from the client. I fully see why you seem to hold them in higher regard than any other body you've ever mentioned, but really, they're no MORE "trained and clever" than professionals in other disciplines.
There does seem to be a certain desperation behind the desire to see a room in which a toy gun was found. I don't know if there are pictures of the broken light. I MAY have seen a naked light bulb suspended from the ceiling but I can't swear to it. It does appear to me that we have pictures of all the rooms that the crime was acted out in.
If Sheila had been on trial, I'd have concurred with you about her records, but to demand them now would be tantamount to saying she was under suspicion. Jeremy, as a convicted prisoner has no fear of suspicion falling on him. One can only think there MAY be something which might further incriminate him.
Re the reasons you believe EP have for holding onto evidence. Once it's gone, it's gone, whether it be lost, mislaid or destroyed. Seems to me that they're in a position of being damned if they do and damned if they don't. I remain convinced that had there been SERIOUS attempts to recover what they're still said to be holding, it COULD have been recovered. There remains the strong possibility that, as Jeremy has said, he now has everything he needs, but as it hasn't proved to yield what he'd hoped for, he's not admitting it?
