Author Topic: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985  (Read 20348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21081
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #150 on: August 03, 2018, 08:03:PM »
how do you explain the blood in the chamber of it then?
The allegation is that Robert Boutflour dripped his own blood into it from a pipette.

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #151 on: August 03, 2018, 08:17:PM »
The allegation is that Robert Boutflour dripped his own blood into it from a pipette.

 :o wtf?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21081
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #152 on: August 03, 2018, 08:18:PM »
:o wtf?
Well the Defence at trial couldn't state that in so many words but Geoffrey Rivlin QC asked Robert Boutflour whether he had cut his finger..
« Last Edit: August 03, 2018, 08:19:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #153 on: August 03, 2018, 08:21:PM »
Well the Defence at trial couldn't state that in so many words but Geoffrey Rivlin QC asked Robert Boutflour whether he had cut his finger..

well i guess that would have been one way blood could have got there ?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #154 on: August 03, 2018, 09:12:PM »
well i guess that would have been one way blood could have got there ?






Indeed. Because it happened to have been the exact blood group of Sheila's which included the AK1 enzyme.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #155 on: August 04, 2018, 07:40:AM »





Indeed. Because it happened to have been the exact blood group of Sheila's which included the AK1 enzyme.

Ya forgot it's shared with the majority of the population.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #156 on: August 04, 2018, 09:09:AM »
Ya forgot it's shared with the majority of the population.






I know that because all the Boutflours had it !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #157 on: August 04, 2018, 09:20:AM »





I know that because all the Boutflours had it !

Why would they not? 44% are O and 42% are A. Now if both RB and SC had been O neg................

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #158 on: August 04, 2018, 10:14:AM »
And all rabbits too !

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #159 on: August 04, 2018, 10:16:AM »
It was a rifle/moderator for the use of killing vermin so why wouldn't it have traces of AK1 on it ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #160 on: August 04, 2018, 10:18:AM »
And all rabbits too !


So what are you suggesting such proves? Sounds like you're trying very hard to make two and two make 5.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #161 on: August 04, 2018, 10:21:AM »

So what are you suggesting such proves? Sounds like you're trying very hard to make two and two make 5.






That it's NOT unusual to find blood such as this on and around a rifle/moderator used for killing vermin. Why does/did it have to be Sheila's ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #162 on: August 04, 2018, 10:46:AM »





That it's NOT unusual to find blood such as this on and around a rifle/moderator used for killing vermin. Why does/did it have to be Sheila's ?

Lookout, given the absolute ludicrousy of someone going to the trouble of cutting themselves deeply enough to bleed enough blood into a pipette -and we all have one of those to hand, don't we?- then to extracted by means of a dropper and dripped it into a silencer, I'd have said there's the likelihood that it may not have been. Even so, despite such an act being underhand, it does not negate Jeremy being the killer.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #163 on: August 04, 2018, 11:11:AM »
Lookout, given the absolute ludicrousy of someone going to the trouble of cutting themselves deeply enough to bleed enough blood into a pipette -and we all have one of those to hand, don't we?- then to extracted by means of a dropper and dripped it into a silencer, I'd have said there's the likelihood that it may not have been. Even so, despite such an act being underhand, it does not negate Jeremy being the killer.






This all started through a cock-up which had been created by EP and it just went on and on like a lie that you can't get out of so it goes on ad-infinitum.
The top and bottom of this whole case s that EP had absolutely nothing on Jeremy because they knew he wasn't the murderer. The whole fiasco was " Much Ado about Nothing "------but to EP had to be made into something to justify their incompetency with previous cases.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The Finding of the Silencer by David Boutflour on September 11th 1985
« Reply #164 on: August 04, 2018, 11:24:AM »





This all started through a cock-up which had been created by EP and it just went on and on like a lie that you can't get out of so it goes on ad-infinitum.
The top and bottom of this whole case s that EP had absolutely nothing on Jeremy because they knew he wasn't the murderer. The whole fiasco was " Much Ado about Nothing "------but to EP had to be made into something to justify their incompetency with previous cases.

That absolutely isn't the case, Lookout. Individually, they were probably as divided as are we. As a unit, they went with whatever were the orders. From the off, as a unit, they believed what Jeremy had said because none had reason not to. Then the family said Sheila couldn't have done it -since when, I believe the only person who has labeled her violent is you. NO one, but no one, has come forward to say she did anything to suggest she may have been- and then there was Jeremy's very out of context with grieving son behaviour and attitude, ONLY displaying grief when he remembered that circumstances dictated such might be appropriate. It HAD to have made them wonder.