Nevills burns revisited.

[Jane]

You cannot pull a piece of string through a sealed window. Once the window is shut the string is squashed and jammed in the frame. If you want to create a fictional event that's in the realm of possibility you probably could do it if you lubricated the window frame then used a threat of monofilament string. You could also drill a small diagonal hole under the catch and push a tooth pick through to move the latch. You could even cut the entire window out the frame and stick it back on from the outside with the latch secured.

But what good are these ideas? Extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions with no evidence to support them do not prove anything.

Really? Didn't they do tests on pigskin which was supposed to prove something similar was done to a human?

[maggie]

Really? Didn't they do tests on pigskin which was supposed to prove something similar was done to a human?

Think again it was thought it may be a possibility and unfortunately the final tests were never carried out.

[Jane]

Think again it was thought it may be a possibility and unfortunately the final tests were never carried out.

Nonetheless, tests were carried out on something other than the original.

[Caroline]

You cannot pull a piece of string through a sealed window. Once the window is shut the string is squashed and jammed in the frame. If you want to create a fictional event that's in the realm of possibility you probably could do it if you lubricated the window frame then used a threat of monofilament string. You could also drill a small diagonal hole under the catch and push a tooth pick through to move the latch. You could even cut the entire window out the frame and stick it back on from the outside with the latch secured.

But what good are these ideas? Extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions with no evidence to support them do not prove anything.

Your whole post is rubbish - I just did so last night and my windows are only a few years old! You took Neil's comment and used it to your advantage - I knew you would, even without seeing the video. Pathetic! But I now know that the whole senario of the house being locked from the inside was BS!

[ngb1066]

Do we know this was the case at White House Farm?

I have no knowledge of this.

[Caroline]

Nonetheless, tests were carried out on something other than the original.

The most ridiculous thing is, that Bamber DID use this window to gain entry. There is something VERY odd about someone who is wiling to dismiss EVERY argument against Bamber. David hasn't even seen the video and yet he's pissing his pants in an attempt to dismiss it.

[Caroline]

I have no knowledge of this.

Well, we know it was slack enough for Bamber to use a hacksaw blade (or something similar) to unlatch the catch and gain entry. A piece of string had no real thickness and can be easily pulled free - I did it on my own windows last night and my windows are pretty new.

[lookout]

He may have used the window in September ? when he got his passport ( he'd already handed over his keys to AE ) doesn't mean to say he also got in this way on the night of the murders though. He hadn't been the only one who knew that way in.

[Caroline]

He may have used the window in September ? when he got his passport ( he'd already handed over his keys to AE ) doesn't mean to say he also got in this way on the night of the murders though. He hadn't been the only one who knew that way in.

Well it's HIGHLY suspicious that he knew how to get in and he had the keys BACK from AE at that point. Also WHO also knew how to get in this way?

[Jane]

The most ridiculous thing is, that Bamber DID use this window to gain entry. There is something VERY odd about someone who is wiling to dismiss EVERY argument against Bamber. David hasn't even seen the video and yet he's pissing his pants in an attempt to dismiss it.

As Jeremy has already said he used the window to gain entry, one can only believe David's incontinence is due to senility.

[lookout]

Well it's HIGHLY suspicious that he knew how to get in and he had the keys BACK from AE at that point. Also WHO also knew how to get in this way?

AP knew how to get in that way as did his half-brother while staying at WHF. This information is in one of the books ( could be Claire's book ) As children they climbed in that way too.
Nothing suspicious about entering your own or past home in this way when a key wasn't available.

[Jane]

AP knew how to get in that way as did his half-brother while staying at WHF. This information is in one of the books ( could be Claire's book ) As children they climbed in that way too.
Nothing suspicious about entering your own or past home in this way when a key wasn't available.

Yeah! He certainly covered all the bases.

[lookout]

Yeah! He certainly covered all the bases.

Such as ? All ?

[Caroline]

AP knew how to get in that way as did his half-brother while staying at WHF. This information is in one of the books ( could be Claire's book ) As children they climbed in that way too.
Nothing suspicious about entering your own or past home in this way when a key wasn't available.

Never seen ANY indication that AP knew how to enter that way and I don't believe he did! There is nothing suspicious until five members of the family all die in a shooting and claims are made to suggest all windows were secured from inside. Once you find out that the main suspect can actually get in the house regardless - all bets are off!

[Jane]

Such as ? All ?

No point is going through them because you won't recognize them as being such.