0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Your above words do NOT read as if you're acknowledging that he gained entry, via the window, PRIOR to the murders.
It depends how you interpret it.
After the murders ? Yes ?
Never mind reply 490. Your earlier post leaves no room for misinterpretation.
It doesn't PROVE that he committed the murders though,does it ?
No, but it adds weight to the possibility!
" Possibility " is no use in a court of law-------not in my books anyway. He did or he didn't it's that simple
You KNOW it adds weight which is why you're peddling like hell to TRY and reduce the impact. It's what you always do. The window incident wasn't the ONKY evidence it added weight to the rest and for someone who made their mind up on intution, the above statement is a bit rich!
" Intuition " has differing meanings indifferent individuals------rightly or wrongly.
It only has one meaning.
Rubbish, it's a sash window which can be locked using string. He used the same window after the murders!
My intuition is different from yours----------understand, comprendre, capire, ?
But from person to person it can have a different meaning, unless you think we're all clones
Locking the windows inside from the outside with a piece of string in the darkness of the night sounds like rubbish to me. The only downstairs light reported as being on was the kitchen light.Torch in one hand, string in the other seems rather implausible also
Intuition is intuition is intuition. Intuition is instinctive thinking which negates the need for reasoned thought. It therefore cannot differ from person to person.
