Author Topic: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?  (Read 20913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33787
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #105 on: June 24, 2018, 01:43:PM »
I thought it was a pedal bin on fire..

I thought it was one of those vacuum cleaners called Henry.

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21156
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #106 on: June 24, 2018, 02:20:PM »
Actually I owe David an apology for creating a new thread on Darlene Gentry when he had already covered it. But maybe he can explain what exactly we are supposed to be looking for in this vacuum cleaner pedal bin picture.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #107 on: June 24, 2018, 02:27:PM »
Actually I owe David an apology for creating a new thread on Darlene Gentry when he had already covered it. But maybe he can explain what exactly we are supposed to be looking for in this vacuum cleaner pedal bin picture.

Seriously Steve? You can't see Nevil's head?   ???
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13796
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #108 on: June 24, 2018, 02:37:PM »
Well there we go. Jane J has just mistook Nevill for a Henry Hoover and Steve has just mistook Nevill for a bin on fire.




Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21156
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #109 on: June 24, 2018, 03:04:PM »
Seriously Steve? You can't see Nevil's head?   ???
Is that his arm on the left of the picture?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33787
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #110 on: June 24, 2018, 03:14:PM »
Actually I owe David an apology for creating a new thread on Darlene Gentry when he had already covered it. But maybe he can explain what exactly we are supposed to be looking for in this vacuum cleaner pedal bin picture.

Well, to summarize. Lookout, according to her, could have told exactly what gender of person was laying dead in that kitchen, and feels the need to strongly criticize the policeman who couldn't. Yet, we, who know the picture well couldn't tell that it was neither pedal bin on fire nor vacuum cleaner.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #111 on: June 24, 2018, 03:24:PM »
Well, to summarize. Lookout, according to her, could have told exactly what gender of person was laying dead in that kitchen, and feels the need to strongly criticize the policeman who couldn't. Yet, we, who know the picture well couldn't tell that it was neither pedal bin on fire nor vacuum cleaner.






I'm not even going to study any picture knowing what it's about ! I've passed it.Don't even feel comfortable with it even if you do.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33787
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #112 on: June 24, 2018, 03:34:PM »





I'm not even going to study any picture knowing what it's about ! I've passed it.Don't even feel comfortable with it even if you do.

The point isn't about you and your allegedly delicate sensitivities, Lookout. It's about what a policeman thought he saw when he glanced through a window.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #113 on: June 24, 2018, 04:07:PM »
The point isn't about you and your allegedly delicate sensitivities, Lookout. It's about what a policeman thought he saw when he glanced through a window.



 


Which had been entered/written several times,particularly when entering ? Thought's no good !!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33787
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #114 on: June 24, 2018, 04:13:PM »


 


Which had been entered/written several times,particularly when entering ? Thought's no good !!

From that distance, he couldn't swear to be accurate. He wouldn't have realized his mistake until he was inside.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #115 on: June 24, 2018, 04:47:PM »
From that distance, he couldn't swear to be accurate. He wouldn't have realized his mistake until he was inside.







Distance ? Through a downstairs window ? Wasn't the light on too ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33787
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #116 on: June 24, 2018, 05:01:PM »






Distance ? Through a downstairs window ? Wasn't the light on too ?

Variables will include angles, body's distance from window, shadows cast by light. Not forgetting how long it had been since the windows were cleaned. Jeez! How long are you going to keep this up? You weren't there. You didn't see what he saw. You have his statement. You can't change it. Get over it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #117 on: June 24, 2018, 05:32:PM »
Is that his arm on the left of the picture?

Yes.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Harry

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #118 on: June 26, 2018, 09:14:AM »
We already know the truth about this. PC Collins mistook Nevill’s body for that of a dead woman and reported it down the radio. While one of his colleagues made the correct observation and reported a dead male. Thus the radio receivers have the impression that one dead man and one dead woman are spotted downstairs.


Rather simple really.  :-\

"We already know the truth about this. PC Collins mistook Nevill’s body for that of a dead woman and reported it down the radio."

Yeah and we know that the soles of Sheila's feet were "spotlessly clean" because a bunch of coppers said so in their statements.



What you are basically saying is that what the police say in there later statements is proof that any discrepancies with earlier reports can be attributed to those reports being mistaken.

You go further than one against one comparisons. You steadfastly maintain that the statements are honest even when there is repeated corroboration of the reports. That is the typical thinking of guilty supporters. Because they are committed to supporting the police.

Your motives are different. Since you got to be aquainted with his lawyers you have brought your own opinions in line with their outdated position.

« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 09:15:AM by Harry »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who was Sheila's accomplice ?
« Reply #119 on: June 26, 2018, 09:34:AM »
"We already know the truth about this. PC Collins mistook Nevill’s body for that of a dead woman and reported it down the radio."

Yeah and we know that the soles of Sheila's feet were "spotlessly clean" because a bunch of coppers said so in their statements.



What you are basically saying is that what the police say in there later statements is proof that any discrepancies with earlier reports can be attributed to those reports being mistaken.

You go further than one against one comparisons. You steadfastly maintain that the statements are honest even when there is repeated corroboration of the reports. That is the typical thinking of guilty supporters. Because they are committed to supporting the police.

Your motives are different. Since you got to be aquainted with his lawyers you have brought your own opinions in line with their outdated position.

The logs support his statement but don't let that stop you from flogging a dead horse.
Few people have the imagination for reality