0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ngb is right. I think the campaign team seem to treat Jeremy as their property. Some people have helped Jeremy so much financially and with their precious time and it seems as soon as anyone shows independently they can help Jeremy overturn his conviction they are frozen outIt’s unacceptable behaviour and unbelievable that they can play with Jeremy’s life the way they doThere are no words
If JEREMY was going to kill his family he would not have phoned the Police.I am not the 'sharpest tool in the box' but even I can work this out.JEREMY loved and still loves his family.
The Police were in effect his alibi.
Fair play to you Steve, and respect. I also apologise for my 'run ins' with you in the past.I have a question for you though..what would it take for you to believe JEREMY is innocent?
One or more of the following:Police on duty on the morning of 7th August 1985 to admit they shot Sheila and staged the scene. Peter and Ann Eaton admitting they dropped menstrual blood into a silencer by means of a pipette and scratched the mantelpiece. Their children overhearing them admit this and reporting them to Police. Similarly Julie admitting that her evidence was a total fabrication or any of her relatives claiming this is what they overheard her say.
Thanks Steve, and again respect.If the 'silencer' could be proved that it could not have been used with 'the rifle'Would you set JEREMY free?
I think that's a hypothetical question because surely this would have been a ground of appeal by now?