Mike, you often go to great lengths to answer questions which haven't been asked or points which haven't been raised...................or possibly to avoid answering questions which HAVE been asked or points which HAVE been raised. The above post being an example of such. You suggest I might "try to pay more attention to detail". It's the details which are left out which deserve attention. THEY'RE of far greater interest to me.
And, so they should be...
These are the facts from where I sit regarding the preposterous claim that Sheila could have shot herself twice with the same rifle and SM in the main bedroom! If you believe that she did then your not thinking straight! She couldn't have shot herself twice using the same rifle with SM fitted, because the gap between the trigger and the position of the lower wound in Sheila's neck was smaller than the gap between the trigger and the muzzle end of the SM fitted to the end of the anshuzt rifles barrel!
It's an impossible scenario that Jeremy and his team are trying to prove occured or happened, he's got his work cut out trying to prove something which cannot possibly be true! Sheila didn't shoot herself, not once, not twice!
As for PC Mildenhall never having made a witness statement regarding his duties of listening and monitoring a 999 call from whf, Mildenhall did make such a witness statement, there is reference to this fact, and to the fact that the DPP and senior officers did not want his statement in as part of the prosecution's case! I have already posted confirmation of this recently but to date no-one else has picked up on this fact! I can't be held accountable for everybody's thought processes, people either pick up on something I am saying, or posting, or they don't...
