Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[Jane]

RB even took it upon himself to involve himself in Mabel Speakman's change of Will. She didn't have to change it, but of course he wanted Pamela to get all her money, not just half of it.

I wouldn't have been finding out who inherits so soon after the deaths - would you?

Of course they wanted the dosh - get real.

But at least they didn't kill to get it

[sami]

The relatives.

the relatives were doing just fine,and not hardup for money,the biggest reason being they had no dreams or plans for a playboy lifestyle unlike jb

[Caroline]

RB even took it upon himself to involve himself in Mabel Speakman's change of Will. She didn't have to change it, but of course he wanted Pamela to get all her money, not just half of it.

I wouldn't have been finding out who inherits so soon after the deaths - would you?

Of course they wanted the dosh - get real.

Not as much as Bamber did - what they did after is a direct result of what he did before.

[Kaldin]

the relatives were doing just fine,and not hardup for money,the biggest reason being they had no dreams or plans for a playboy lifestyle unlike jb

Did you not know that Nevill owned some land which Ann Eaton wanted? Jeremy would have inherited that. Did you not know that RB and PB didn't own their farm? Jeremy would have got half of that as well if Mabel Speakman hadn't changed her Will.

[sami]

RB even took it upon himself to involve himself in Mabel Speakman's change of Will. She didn't have to change it, but of course he wanted Pamela to get all her money, not just half of it.

I wouldn't have been finding out who inherits so soon after the deaths - would you?

Of course they wanted the dosh - get real.

yes i would ,i would want to know asap if the murderer was going to gain from the deaths.its human nature

[Kaldin]

yes i would ,i would want to know asap if the murderer was going to gain from the deaths.its human nature

They wanted to know how much they would get if Jeremy was convicted. There's a big difference.

[sami]

Did you not know that Nevill owned some land which Ann Eaton wanted? Jeremy would have inherited that. Did you not know that RB and PB didn't own their farm? Jeremy would have got half of that as well if Mabel Speakman hadn't changed her Will.

yes i did ,but do you know they didnt do the killings, jb did

[sami]

They wanted to know how much they would get if Jeremy was convicted. There's a big difference.

they were making sure that crime does not pay

[Kaldin]

yes i did ,but do you know they didnt do the killings, jb did

Irrelevant.

[David1819]

the relatives were doing just fine,and not hardup for money,the biggest reason being they had no dreams or plans for a playboy lifestyle unlike jb

Jeremy was set to inherit the land that the Eatons were farming on. Jeremy was going to sell this land to pay the inheritance tax bill. So they were not doing fine at all. The only thing that would save them from bankruptcy would be Jeremy being disinherited.

[Kaldin]

they were making sure that crime does not pay

By making a nice tidy sum themselves. Mabel Speakman's money was nothing to do with the Bambers, but they made sure that went to them as well.

[sami]

Jeremy was set to inherit the land that the Eatons were farming on. Jeremy was going to sell this land to pay the inheritance tax bill. So they were not doing fine at all. The only thing that would save them from bankruptcy would be Jeremy being disinherited.

have you seen the official will,or you just chatting shit as usual

[David1819]

have you seen the official will,or you just chatting shit as usual

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,788.msg20592.html#msg20592

[sami]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,788.msg20592.html#msg20592

thats what you call proof,who wrote it you or mike

[Kaldin]

If going after the money was merely to prevent Jeremy profiting from a crime, how come the Pargeters sued the other lot for their share, and how come the Boutflours didn't offer the Pargeters a fair share?