Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[David1819]

I believe he changed his stance bcause he realised the silencer could be fabricated.
I agree that the relatives could have transferred the blood into the silencer, so stop saying that no one agrees Adam.

The majority of the forum believe the silencer was fabricated.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7747.msg365525.html#msg365525

I don't know who Adam thinks he is fooling by saying 'No one agrees'

[mike tesko]

I don't believe that the silencer belonging to the Bamber anshuzt rifle was used, on the other hand threre is a strong case for supposing that Anthony Pargeters silencer and gun was used in the shootings...

[buddy]

Okay then, who believes that Bamber donned a wetsuit, cycled 3 miles , gained entry to the farm then
cycled back home? I don't.

[mike tesko]

Okay then, who believes that Bamber donned a wetsuit, cycled 3 miles , gained entry to the farm then
cycled back home? I don't.

Buddy, he didn't...

[lookout]

No,JB didn't do that either. He wasn't into triathlons.

[buddy]

Buddy, he didn't...

No I don't think so Mike. Imagine cycling 6 miles in a wetsuit, committing 5 murders, and battering a person. You would have been sweating buckets.

[Jane]

Okay then, who believes that Bamber donned a wetsuit, cycled 3 miles , gained entry to the farm then
cycled back home? I don't.

He might have put a disguise in the cycle-bag/basket. Peddling in a wet/dry suit at any time of day would have been difficult.

[Jane]

No,JB didn't do that either. He wasn't into triathlons.

Such a short distance hardly amounts to a triathlon.

[lookout]

Such a short distance hardly amounts to a triathlon.

You don't say 

[buddy]

Such a short distance hardly amounts to a triathlon.

I don't want to demean any poster, but I ask you cycling 6 miles in a wetsuit seems highly unlikely.

[Jane]

I don't want to demean any poster, but I ask you cycling 6 miles in a wetsuit seems highly unlikely.

Did RWB say it as a statement of fact, OR did he offer it as a possibility?

[mike tesko]

I don't want to demean any poster, but I ask you cycling 6 miles in a wetsuit seems highly unlikely.

A heavily bloodstained wet suit at that!

[Adam]

I believe he changed his stance bcause he realised the silencer could be fabricated.
I agree that the relatives could have transferred the blood into the silencer, so stop saying that no one agrees Adam.

Can you tell me how the relatives had information on the following -


Contact shots during the massacre.

Liklihood of back splatter with that rifle.

Blood already on rifle nozzle.

Photos of aga.

Lenght of rifle with silencer.

Lenght of Sheila's arms.

Other evidence showing guilt/innocence.

Police checks already carried out on silencers.

Where to get Sheila's blood.

How to insert Sheila's blood.

If unable to get Sheila's blood, what was her blood type.

Would someone else's blood be enough.

How to effectivly scrape the aga to replicate a scrape during a random fight.

Possibility of a successful silencer frame securing a conviction.

Punishment if convicted of a attempting to frame a man of murdering 5 people.

--------------

And then tell the forum how it's possible to go into a bucket of water & transfer diluted wet blood embedded into underwear into silencer baffles.

[Jane]

A heavily bloodstained wet suit at that!

Why would it be? He wasn't at the business end of the rifle.

[mike tesko]

A heavily bloodstained wet suit at that!

Oh, I forgot to mention, Jeremy had a shower before he left the scene, obviously mindful that he didn't want to leave absolutely no trace of his presence inside the farmhouse during the shootings, his escape afterwards via a ground floor window, and of course any trace of any victims blood on the bicycle belonging to his mother, June Bamber - oh, and then I woke up, it was only a dream (or part of a prosecution witnesses statement)...