Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[mike tesko]

I don't think writing Stan Jones on a document is evidence of his signature, but you havehelped further the myth David. Well done! 

see latest thread, and see Stan Jones signature on the lab' documents, regarding how he was involved in the introduction of at least 10 spent cartridge cases (DRH/4, DRH/19, DRH/20, DRH/37,  DRH/38, DRH/39 (a), DRH/39 (b), DRH/40, DRH/41 and DRH/43) so that the cops could allege the shootings had been a one gun crime!!

[Caroline]

see latest thread, and see Stan Jones signature on the lab' documents, regarding how he was involved in the introduction of at least 10 spent cartridge cases (DRH/4, DRH/19, DRH/20, DRH/37,  DRH/38, DRH/39 (a), DRH/39 (b), DRH/40, DRH/41 and DRH/43) so that the cops could allege the shootings had been a one gun crime!!

I'm really more concerned that a document posted out of the blue by David,is now being used as proof that a dubious series of numbers and letters ends up being Stan Jone's signature. Where is the proof that what David posted is Stan Jone's signatire? With all due respect, neither yours or his word is good enough - where is the proof?

[lookout]

I think that's the least of anyone's problems at this stage,Caroline. As things are all but done and dusted.

[David1819]

I'm really more concerned that a document posted out of the blue by David,is now being used as proof that a dubious series of numbers and letters ends up being Stan Jone's signature.

Now?     Mike posted this over a year a ago

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7638.msg366966.html#msg366966

[Caroline]

I think that's the least of anyone's problems at this stage,Caroline. As things are all but done and dusted.

Well, that's clearly NOT the case, it's certainly a concern of mine and should be of yours. A statement is posted without any corroboration it's then suggested that a dubious series of numbers and letters is Stan Jone's signature from a document that doesn't even mention him - then all of s suddenly because of these DUBIOUS bits of info - the whole case is cracked. Sorry, you might lap this incredulous guff up, but not me - I need PROOF and not simply the words of posters who have made highfalutin claims before, that have turned out to be nothing more than bluster.

How do you imagine that for one moment ANY of this would help Bamber get an appeal?

[Caroline]

Now?     Mike posted this over a year a ago

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7638.msg366966.html#msg366966

WHERE does the document state that what you posted is STAN JONE'S signature?

[mike tesko]

Stan Jones signature is on the lab' documents, its been verified by Ewen Smith when he was Jeremy's solicitor (2003)...

[Caroline]

Stan Jones signature is on the lab' documents, its been verified by Ewen Smith when he was Jeremy's solicitor (2003)...

Well, yes, you've said that but where did Ewen Smith to back that up? Sorry but no one's signature starts with a number 3 and doesn't include a surname. Post something to back it up and I will concede to being wrong. Jones isn't mentioned in those documents and COLP notes look nothing like the writing posted as his signature. He has a 'distinctive' way or writing an S.

[mike tesko]

Well, yes, you've said that but where did Ewen Smith to back that up? Sorry but no one's signature starts with a number 3.

Stan Jones signature appears on several action reports and other police documents, there is no doubt that its Stan Jones signature, he never signed his signature, with an S, then a B followed by J...

[lookout]

Well, that's clearly NOT the case, it's certainly a concern of mine and should be of yours. A statement is posted without any corroboration it's then suggested that a dubious series of numbers and letters is Stan Jone's signature from a document that doesn't even mention him - then all of s suddenly because of these DUBIOUS bits of info - the whole case is cracked. Sorry, you might lap this incredulous guff up, but not me - I need PROOF and not simply the words of posters who have made highfalutin claims before, that have turned out to be nothing more than bluster.

How do you imagine that for one moment ANY of this would help Bamber get an appeal?

My info is from another area-------not this one as I haven't really bothered with it as you'll notice.

[Caroline]

Stan Jones signature appears on several action reports and other police documents, there is no doubt that its Stan Jones signature, he never signed his signature, with an S, then a B followed by J...

I will look into this further - I certainly have doubts. But I'm not arguing this any further as it's just going round and round. If the above is true, then there must a be a document that carries this signature that actually mentions him.

[Caroline]

My info is from another area-------not this one as I haven't really bothered with it as you'll notice.

Yeah OK - you mean the CT! 

[mike tesko]

I will look into this further - I certainly have doubts. But I'm not arguing this any further as it's just going round and round. If the above is true, then there must a be a document that carries this signature that actually mentions him.

There are many documents in existence giving examples of Stan Jones signature for comparison purposes!

[mike tesko]

There are many documents in existence giving examples of Stan Jones signature for comparison purposes!

What was Stan Jones doing getting himself involved in the introduction of 10 dodgy cartridge casings prior to the 20th September, 1985?

[mike tesko]

Well, yes, you've said that but where did Ewen Smith to back that up? Sorry but no one's signature starts with a number 3 and doesn't include a surname. Post something to back it up and I will concede to being wrong. Jones isn't mentioned in those documents and COLP notes look nothing like the writing posted as his signature. He has a 'distinctive' way or writing an S.

The COLP statement notes were written up by a COLP officer, not by the individual officers such as Stan Jones...