Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[Jane]

I don't recall that I, or other detractors, have relied on any of Mike's posts to support our argument.

[mike tesko]

Stan Jones signature was very distinctive, and unique...

He had a hand in many naughty things in the investigation - for example, he had a hand in the seizing of the sound Moderator (SBJ/1) on the first morning, he returned 'it' to the farmhouse on evening 9th August, where it remained until David Boutfour found it on the following day! People can pretend all they want to that Stan Jones didn't recover it on that occasion, but he did and what's more, he seized a total of four exhibits at that time, including, SBJ/4, SBJ/3, and SBJ/2...

He took possession of the sound Moderator, on the occasion I have mentioned, so cops had it before the relatives! This can only mean that cops knew it was of limited value to their investigation! Even after relatives re-introduced 'it' cops appeared somewhat reluctant to utilise it...

[Caroline]

David, you can post as many renditions of this as you like but how is it a signature? You're calling it that but that doesn't make it a signature nor does it mean that the same letters are under that scribble - you just think it is!!

Where does the document you posted mention Stand Jones?

[Caroline]

who posted all the statements here in the first place I belive it was mike.

How is that relevant? So because someone posts legit statements - it mean they all are? You and David can believe what you like - that's your prerogative but if I believe that something isn't legit - then that's mine!

[nugnug]

How is that relevant? So because someone posts legit statements - it mean they all are? You and David can believe what you like - that's your prerogative but if I believe that something isn't legit - then that's mine!

if you think somone posts forged documents then surely you have to qustion everything theyve posted.

[Jane]

if you think somone posts forged documents then surely you have to qustion everything theyve posted.

I'd say that there's a very strong possibility that many have. Sometimes it's best to hold onto these things.

[nugnug]

I'd say that there's a very strong possibility that many have. Sometimes it's best to hold onto these things.

so if you think that as mikes posted all the statements how dou know weather they are the real statments or notso why are you then yousing  the same statments to back your own arguments a dource is ethere reliable or it isnt.

it does not become reliable when its suporting your arguments and stop relaible when it doesnt.

[David1819]

Caroline, you can post as many excuses as you like but how is that not a signature? You're calling it otherwise but that doesn't make it not a signature nor does it mean that the same letters are not under that scribble - you just think it isn't!!

Caroline, you can post as many excuses as you like but how is that not a signature? You're calling it otherwise but that doesn't make it anything but signature nor does it mean that the same letters are not under that scribble - you just think they are not!!

Where does the document you posted mention Stand Jones?

According to Mike, Its Stan Jones signature on those lab documents. It appears on several of them. If you want to question whether its SJ signature or not, take it up with Mike not me.

[Jane]

I don't recall that I, or other detractors, have relied on any of Mike's posts to support our argument.

How many times must I repeat myself, nugs?

[nugnug]

How many times must I repeat myself, nugs?

as many times as  you like im still going to ignore you/

[Jane]

as many times as  you like im still going to ignore you/

Whilst you persist in repeating the same bloody stupid question which has already BEEN answered, I won't bother.  I wonder if it's occurred to you that no one else has bothered, either. Still carry on, if it amuses you.

[mike tesko]

Caroline, you can post as many excuses as you like but how is that not a signature? You're calling it otherwise but that doesn't make it anything but signature nor does it mean that the same letters are not under that scribble - you just think they are not!!


According to Mike, Its Stan Jones signature on those lab documents. It appears on several of them. If you want to question whether its SJ signature or not, take it up with Mike not me.

I can confirm that Stan Jones signatures appear on key Lab' records pertaining to crime scene ammunition. As such I have decided to share with you all the truly outstanding discovery I have been able to decide took place, in an effort to frame Jeremy Bamber for these murders, including the murder of his sister...

I am going to disclose that which I say establishes beyond reasonable doubt that Cops and relatives and their expert witnesses, framed Bamber as the coldblooded murderer, I am starting a new thread for the sole purpose of putting this wrong to right!

At the heart of this conspiracy, were Essex police, in particular, Stan Jones, the relatives, in particular, Robert Boutflour, David Boutflour, Ann and Peter Eaton, and Lab' Experts, Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletcher, John Hayward and Brian Elliot..

I know what they did, and how they went about making Jeremy Bamber the killer - all will be revealed tonight!

[Adam]

I can confirm that Stan Jones signatures appear on key Lab' records pertaining to crime scene ammunition. As such I have decided to share with you all the truly outstanding discovery I have been able to decide took place, in an effort to frame Jeremy Bamber for these murders, including the murder of his sister...

I am going to disclose that which I say establishes beyond reasonable doubt that Cops and relatives and their expert witnesses, framed Bamber as the coldblooded murderer, I am starting a new thread for the sole purpose of putting this wrong to right!

At the heart of this conspiracy, were Essex police, in particular, Stan Jones, the relatives, in particular, Robert Boutflour, David Boutflour, Ann and Peter Eaton, and Lab' Experts, Glynis Howard, Malcolm Fletcher, John Hayward and Brian Elliot..

I know what they did, and how they went about making Jeremy Bamber the killer - all will be revealed tonight!

Thank you Mike.

[Caroline]

Caroline, you can post as many excuses as you like but how is that not a signature? You're calling it otherwise but that doesn't make it anything but signature nor does it mean that the same letters are not under that scribble - you just think they are not!!


According to Mike, Its Stan Jones signature on those lab documents. It appears on several of them. If you want to question whether its SJ signature or not, take it up with Mike not me.

According to Mike?  How is THIS a signature David? And WHERE does the document you posted mention Stan Jones?

[Caroline]

According to Mike?  How is THIS a signature David? And WHERE does the document you posted mention Stan Jones?

I don't think writing Stan Jones on a document is evidence of his signature, but you havehelped further the myth David. Well done!