Author Topic: Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family  (Read 119606 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Well it can be an extremely distressing time and I think most people charged with that task just take a  quick look then withdraw.





She hadn't been " charged " with the task Steve------she volunteered.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091




She hadn't been " charged " with the task Steve------she volunteered.
Well we've been over this before. She was the only one present apart from Colin who could tell the twins apart.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Well we've been over this before. She was the only one present apart from Colin who could tell the twins apart.





In view of her post-funeral antics,I don't take the fact that she'd been the only one who could identify the twins as her " excuse " for having gone.
Why hadn't S.Jones permitted Heather,who'd been the first to offer on Colin's behalf.?

One can't help but feel an ulterior motive in everything that man did.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44310
I don't believe posters should support Bamber just because Julie identified the twins. Which some supporters do.

A decision needs to be made on the evidence. Of which none shows Sheila was the killer.

Bamber rang Julie 3 times within 7 hours either side of the massacre. After being whisked over to WHF in a police car against her will,  she probably assumed she should try to do something to be helpful.

The jury at trial knew Julie identified the twins. She mentioned it herself.  However it was not considered worthy of being mentioned by the judge in his summing up & the jury voted guilty.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 01:09:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Despite what Stan Jones says about Sheila being almost spotlessly clean, the photographic evidence taken by PC Bird (part of second SOC team which started taking pictures from 10.00am onward) tells an entirely different story - since, her body was bloodstained, her clothing was bloodstained, her face was bloodstained, her neck was bloodstained, there was blood in her left eye socket, her right forearm was bloodstained, the top part of her right wrist / hand was bloodstained, her feet were bloodstained, she had a broken toe nail...
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 02:13:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
I don't believe posters should support Bamber just because Julie identified the twins. Which some supporters do.

A decision needs to be made on the evidence. Of which none shows Sheila was the killer.

Bamber rang Julie 3 times within 7 hours either side of the massacre. After being whisked over to WHF in a police car against her will,  she probably assumed she should try to do something to be helpful.

The jury at trial knew Julie identified the twins. She mentioned it herself.  However it was not considered worthy of being mentioned by the judge in his summing up & the jury voted guilty.

Youre xxxxxxx xxx
Julie had a million chances to be helpful after the murders but she didn't did she according to your take on things
The jury didn't know at trial about the NOTW deal did they?
You need to find another hobby if u continue to ignore facts
How about train spotting
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 02:10:PM by maggie »
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I have decided that she did have blood all over her body and on her clothing and that this is consistent with her being involved in an altercation with someone who was bleeding at the time, or that some of these bloodstains manifested after cops shot her the second time...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I have decided that she did have blood all over her body and on her clothing and that this is consistent with her being involved in an altercation with someone who was bleeding at the time, or that some of these bloodstains manifested after cops shot her the second time...

I have decided that Sheila could not possibly have been shot twice in quick succession there on the bedroom floor, because what Stan Jones told Ann Eaton at Jeremy's cottage on the first morning of the police investigation about Sheila's body being laid on top of the bed was true, he would have had no need to lie about it, and he didn't...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296
I have decided that she did have blood all over her body and on her clothing and that this is consistent with her being involved in an altercation with someone who was bleeding at the time, or that some of these bloodstains manifested after cops shot her the second time...
I'm with you up to the point of the cops shooting Shiela. I can't believe that happened.
It would not have harmed the police to admit that they had shot her, either accidently or on purpose
On the other hand perhaps Taff knew this, and went with murder/suicide so the cops were not grilled.
It was not until Taff was replaced that things changed.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44310
Youre barking mad
Julie had a million chances to be helpful after the murders but she didn't did she according to your take on things
The jury didn't know at trial about the NOTW deal did they?
You need to find another hobby if u continue to ignore facts
How about train spotting

If I'm the 'xxxxxxx xxx one, why do people call you xxx' Jackie.

I have lots of hobbies thanks.  Making Bamber Youtube videos not being one of them. But thanks for the train spotting suggestion. I'll look into it.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2017, 02:11:PM by maggie »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
I'm with you up to the point of the cops shooting Shiela. I can't believe that happened.
It would not have harmed the police to admit that they had shot her, either accidently or on purpose
On the other hand perhaps Taff knew this, and went with murder/suicide so the cops were not grilled.
It was not until Taff was replaced that things changed.






It would be interesting to know the truth of why " Taff " was replaced,would it not ? The real reason.

Offline buddy

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1296





It would be interesting to know the truth of why " Taff " was replaced,would it not ? The real reason.
I thought it was the family who said they had no confidence in Taff.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
I thought it was the family who said they had no confidence in Taff.
[/quote






Mmmmm.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
It wouldn't surprise me if he faked his own suicide whilst the balance of his mind was disturbed, the Bamber case preying on him as he realized he had been outwitted by a person who had ostensibly deceived him by achieving a similar outcome.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 03:15:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Just 30 years+ experience under his belt,10 + commendations against a two-bit sergeant to solve one of the worst crimes of its time ? Can you believe that ?