Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[lookout]

Was DC 494 Benton one of the crooked police officers who has been creating these genuinely fake composite witness statements that are everywhere?

Why no witness statement from DC Benton saying that on a particular date that he took a witness statement from David Boutflour?

The clue is in the first 4 letters of his surname.

[mike tesko]

The clue is in the first 4 letters of his surname.

Great spot!

[maggie]

The thing that has hurt me Caroline, the fact that this low life can call us th
xxxx all those of you who think that injustice can never occur, you are all lower than a snakes belly, nothing but evil, vile low life scumbags!


Without one person or poster sticking up for us, he is doing what he has blamed the police for with documents, only NGB has had the guts to to say as such so, shame on them and shame on them that openly call the family and experts.

I have not been on the forum today until now and very little the past week or so.  If I had been on I would not have just stood by or looked the other way.  I completely support ngb's stance.

[mike tesko]

Lets introduce named conspirators involved in the sound moderator debacle - Detective Inspector Ron Cook, to begin with...

Now, we know that Cook kept the sound moderator according to what he told COLP, that he kept the sound moderator (SJ/1) in his jacket pocket for 17 days and nights after Glynis Howard handed it back to him at Huntingdon Lab' on the 13th August 1985. So, on the following day when Cook and Jones went back to the farmhouse on the pretense of taking measurements required  for the coroner, Ron Cook must have had that sound moderator with him, because he told COLP in a witness statement (bearing in mind that he made that witness statement of his own free will, knowing that if he stated in it anything that was false or he knew not to be true, that he would be liable to prosecution - in any event, Ron Cook did have that sound moderator with him at the scene when he went there along with police Inspector 'Bob' Miller, and Stan Jones, in the company of Ann Eaton!

Now Ann Eaton was told by the cops on that occasion, that she had not seen whatever it was that the cops had been doing in the region of the kitchen aga!

In Cooks version of the events he merely took a paint sample which he claims was given the exhibit reference RWC/1. Miller and Jones back him up in their respective versions of the events...

But what is very interesting is that in Stan Jones haste to corroborate what Cook said he had done and did, Jones states that the cops didn't have the sound moderator with them when they went to the scene on that day, at the time Cook took that paint sample...

[mike tesko]

Lets introduce named conspirators involved in the sound moderator debacle - Detective Inspector Ron Cook, to begin with...

Now, we know that Cook kept the sound moderator according to what he told COLP, that he kept the sound moderator (SJ/1) in his jacket pocket for 17 days and nights after Glynis Howard handed it back to him at Huntingdon Lab' on the 13th August 1985. So, on the following day when Cook and Jones went back to the farmhouse on the pretense of taking measurements required  for the coroner, Ron Cook must have had that sound moderator with him, because he told COLP in a witness statement (bearing in mind that he made that witness statement of his own free will, knowing that if he stated in it anything that was false or he knew not to be true, that he would be liable to prosecution - in any event, Ron Cook did have that sound moderator with him at the scene when he went there along with police Inspector 'Bob' Miller, and Stan Jones, in the company of Ann Eaton!

Now Ann Eaton was told by the cops on that occasion, that she had not seen whatever it was that the cops had been doing in the region of the kitchen aga!

In Cooks version of the events he merely took a paint sample which he claims was given the exhibit reference RWC/1. Miller and Jones back him up in their respective versions of the events...

But what is very interesting is that in Stan Jones haste to corroborate what Cook said he had done and did, Jones states that the cops didn't have the sound moderator with them when they went to the scene on that day, at the time Cook took that paint sample...

But Ron Cook did have the sound moderator in his jacket pocket at the farmhouse that day (14th August 1985)...

[Jane]

I have not been on the forum today until now and very little the past week or so.  If I had been on I would not have just stood by or looked the other way.  I completely support ngb's stance.

The insults and threats -not to mention the foul language- levied against Justice -who MORE than lives up to the name, being one of the most objective and reasonable posters here, were beyond unacceptable and unforgivable.

[mike tesko]

Stan Jones made a false witness statement to the COLP investigators, he knew full well that when Cook, Miller, himself, and Ann Eaton, went to whf on the 14th August 1985...

Here is the blatant lie that Stan Jones put in his so called statement of truth:-

The sound moderator was definitely with Cook, Miller, Jones and Eaton when they went and marked the kitchen aga on the 14th August 1985. Ron Cook took it to the scene concealed in his jacket pocket so now we have key cops telling blatant lies for each other, trying to pretend that the sound moderator was not with the motley crew at the scene on that day, when all along it was!

[maggie]

The insults and threats -not to mention the foul language- levied against Justice -who MORE than lives up to the name, being one of the most objective and reasonable posters here, were beyond unacceptable and unforgivable.

I know I have just read through them.

[mike tesko]

Stan Jones made a false witness statement to the COLP investigators, he knew full well that when Cook, Miller, himself, and Ann Eaton, went to whf on the 14th August 1985...

Here is the blatant lie that Stan Jones put in his so called statement of truth:-

The sound moderator was definitely with Cook, Miller, Jones and Eaton when they went and marked the kitchen aga on the 14th August 1985. Ron Cook took it to the scene concealed in his jacket pocket so now we have key cops telling blatant lies for each other, trying to pretend that the sound moderator was not with the motley crew at the scene on that day, when all along it was!

So this brings me on to the coup de grace evidence, the mould that Elliot took from the underside of the kitchen mantelpiece in the kitchen at whf...

Apparently, it had corresponding marks of the knurl around the circumference of the silencers end cap, and so it should be obvious to a headless chicken that Cook and all those present at the scene on that date, did use the silencer to make that mark / impression - it was not just a case of Cook taking a paint sample, it was a case of using the sound moderator to make that indentation which in turn caused red paint particles to become ingrained into the knurl of that silencer!

[mike tesko]

Ron Cook contaminated the end of the sound moderator with paint from the kitchen aga surround, he did this on the 14th August 1985, whilst the other three conspirators looked on! The three bent coppers who were there on that occasion swore Ann Eaton to secrecy, they told her that she hadn't seen what had been done, Ann Eaton knew the truth right from that day onward, she knew how red paint from the kitchen aga surround got into the knurl of the silencers end cap...

[mike tesko]

And there was Stan Jones, talking the big talk how he knew on the 14th August 1985, that the blood on the silencer was human, and that he knew this by the 14th August 1985:-

According to Glynis Howard, there was insufficient blood on the outside of the sound moderator for blood grouping purposes...

Its not at all surprising that there should bee any blood on the outside of that sound moderator considering that it was transported away from the scene in the boot of Ann Eatons car along with bloodstained knickers belonging to Sheila Caffell in a bucket, which were all transported to the Eaton home, and handled without gloves by the relatives...

That's the most likeliest explanation for how a small amount of human blood got onto the outside of the sound moderator, it got there as a result of contamination during the transportation of it and other bloodstained items that relatives took away from the scene on the 10th August 1985...

[lookout]

The insults and threats -not to mention the foul language- levied against Justice -who MORE than lives up to the name, being one of the most objective and reasonable posters here, were beyond unacceptable and unforgivable.

Well it's not me,I've hardly been on the forum this week. I can't be blamed for everything ?

[Adam]

I wonder how Stan Jones knew it was human blood as early as the 14th August. Did EP have equipment which could determine it was human blood ?

What date was the silencer given to Huntingdon ?

[lookout]

He wouldn't have known until it had been tested and verified as such.

[mike tesko]

And there was Stan Jones, talking the big talk how he knew on the 14th August 1985, that the blood on the silencer was human, and that he knew this by the 14th August 1985:-

According to Glynis Howard, there was insufficient blood on the outside of the sound moderator for blood grouping purposes...

Its not at all surprising that there should bee any blood on the outside of that sound moderator considering that it was transported away from the scene in the boot of Ann Eatons car along with bloodstained knickers belonging to Sheila Caffell in a bucket, which were all transported to the Eaton home, and handled without gloves by the relatives...

That's the most likeliest explanation for how a small amount of human blood got onto the outside of the sound moderator, it got there as a result of contamination during the transportation of it and other bloodstained items that relatives took away from the scene on the 10th August 1985...

Also of some significance, was the fact that when Ann Eaton came to make her COLP witness statement, she was telling COLP that DCS 'Mick' Ainsley, had told her that when it came time for her to give evidence during the forthcoming trial, that the defence might allege that relatives had deliberately contaminated the sound moderator with Sheila's blood from her soiled panties. How she had responded to Ainsley by saying that she would say that there was a different smell to ordinary blood as opposed to  menstrual blood! And, How Ainsley had told her to make sure she told the court that when she gave evidence if she was asked about it...