Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[Caroline]

The thing that has hurt me Caroline, the fact that this low life can call us th
xxxx all those of you who think that injustice can never occur, you are all lower than a snakes belly, nothing but evil, vile low life scumbags!


Without one person or poster sticking up for us, he is doing what he has blamed the police for with documents, only NGB has had the guts to tosay so, shame on them and shame on them that openly call the family and experts.

Well, I have learned not to expect any support from anyone other than a few people. I came here to find the truth, not be led down a a path of crumbs that someone else 'wishes' was the truth. I guess it's a game for some people and they can call me all the fucking scumb bags in the word - it's like water off a ducks back because in the end, they know that I know the truth. Lets leave 'denile' where it belngs - in Egypt - full of you know what!

[Jon2]

SJ altered Colin Caffell's statement , then asked him not to mention it , was Colin's the only statement
altered ?

[Jon2]

Ask Mike, he’s an expert

Do police forces alter statements ?

[lookout]

Is the Pope Catholic.??

[Caroline]

SJ altered Colin Caffell's statement , then asked him not to mention it , was Colin's the only statement
altered ?

Was it really 'altered'?

[mike tesko]

Where is the mistake Mike? This is a list of the times you have used the word 'aforementioned' - it is your buzz word. I think it's best that we have the statement looked at by someone outside of the forum and lets stop the sillyness altogether. It doesn't help anyone. Some peole may just take this stuff at face vaule, others have learned to believe nothing unless there is proof.

Stop trying to be pedantic!!!

[mike tesko]

I can easily play your silly little nonsensical game - of pedantic bullshit...

lets look at some of the hundreds and hundreds of genuine fake composite witness statements, and official police documentation:-...

Oh, look, two sound Moderators, not just one!!

[mike tesko]

I can easily play your silly little nonsensical game - of pedantic bullshit...

lets look at some of the hundreds and hundreds of genuine fake composite witness statements, and official police documentation:-...

Oh, look, two sound Moderators, not just one!!

If there was only the one sound moderator, then how come it mentions two sound moderators, if there was in reality only one..

[mike tesko]

If there was only the one sound moderator, then how come it mentions two sound moderators, if there was in reality only one..

Please, let me remind you mother fukkers, that if there was only the one sound moderator, then how come a sound moderator had been submitted to the lab' at Huntingdon on the 30th August 1985, and another submitted to the lab' on the 20th Sepetember 1985?

THINK!!!

[mike tesko]

Please, let me remind you mother fukkers, that if there was only the one sound moderator, then how come a sound moderator had been submitted to the lab' at Huntingdon on the 30th August 1985, and another submitted to the lab' on the 20th Sepetember 1985?

THINK!!!

Lets get the facts right, as reported by Essex police and the lab' -

blood found inside a silencer (DB/1) that was dismantled at the lab' by the ballistic expert, Fletcher on the 12th September, 1985, but attributed to a different sound moderator (DRB/1) which was not submitted to the Lab' until the 20th September 1985...

Am I reporting 'THE FACTS' right, well, yes, of course I am...

[mike tesko]

Why was it necessary, to merge two different sound moderators (handed to Essex police by Peter Eaton to Stan Jones on 12th August 1985), and by his wife, Ann Eaton who handed a sound moderator to DC Oakey on the 11th Septemebr 1985, if there really was just the one sound moderator? Er... something simply does not add up, or match here...

Maybe some of you will think that I am a low life scumbag who is making things up? But, alas, I am neither a low life scumbag nor am I making things up...

Why would I need to make things up, when the opposition is so blatently making things up, and I have the very simple task of exposing the lies they are introducing??

[Jon2]

Was it really 'altered'?

How would u word it , if altered , is not right word ?
CC said one thing , SJ changed it to something else , SJ asked CC to not mention his change .

[David1819]

Well, I have learned not to expect any support from anyone other than a few people. I came here to find the truth, not be led down a a path of crumbs that someone else 'wishes' was the truth.

But that's exactly what you are trying to do now. And I say trying because your path of crumbs that you portray as the truth has less commuters than Blake Hall tube station.

[mike tesko]

Any way, as I have consistently been mataining, the DJones composite witness statement, dated, 8th September 1985, is genuine to the best   knowledge and belief! It's not my fault that there are those amongst us that the contents of the same, find to be upsetting and distressing!

Oh, and my own IP address remains the same at all times for whichever device I might be using...

[Jane]

Any way, as I have consistently been mataining, the DJones composite witness statement, dated, 8th September 1985, is genuine to the best   knowledge and belief! It's not my fault that there are those amongst us that the contents of the same, find to be upsetting and distressing!

Oh, and my own IP address remains the same at all times for whichever device I might be using...

So Mike, to summarize after all that unnecessary unpleasantness earlier, what you're really saying, is that in YOUR OPINION "the DJones composite witness statement,dated 8th September 1985 is genuine". That is your prerogative. Personally, I don't find the contents "to be upsetting or distressing" because I DON'T believe the report to be genuine. That is MY prerogative. I see no reason to be other than adult about it.